On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:44:54PM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I think I'll commit that to apport, if you don't mind. It's easier to
> maintain there, we don't need to require that you have some linux-
> common package installed, and uploading/building apport is much faster
> than the kernel.
OK. Do you agree that the package hook belongs in the kernel packages,
or would you rather have that in apport as well? The kernel team is
probably in a better position to maintain it.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:44:54PM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I think I'll commit that to apport, if you don't mind. It's easier to
> maintain there, we don't need to require that you have some linux-
> common package installed, and uploading/building apport is much faster
> than the kernel.
OK. Do you agree that the package hook belongs in the kernel packages,
or would you rather have that in apport as well? The kernel team is
probably in a better position to maintain it.
--
- mdz