Comment 7 for bug 1366174

Thank you for the detailed investigation upstream.

> If it's going to be difficult to fix this against 2.4.7, would getting 2.4.10 (the Utopic version) into trusty-backports be permissible? That way at least I'd get security updates. I can confirm this builds out of the box with no issues.

I think trusty-backports would be admissible, but note that security updates to trusty-backports are done by community members (like universe is), and isn't managed by Canonical.

I guess we'll need to wait and see what the correct upstream fix is. But now that you've isolated it, it looks like a fix would be more isolated and suitable for cherry-picking?