Dustin and Iulian Udrea already reviewed Tahoe-LAFS, and then Brian Warner uploaded a new package of Tahoe-LAFS which "fixes the maintainer field, and relaxes the pycryptopp requirement to 0.5.14": http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/tahoe-lafs . Do we need any further review of Tahoe-LAFS?
So, it appears that it is sufficiently reviewed and the Masters of the Universe are willing to make an exception to the Feature Freeze to let it in. :-)
Dustin and Iulian Udrea already reviewed Tahoe-LAFS, and then Brian Warner uploaded a new package of Tahoe-LAFS which "fixes the maintainer field, and relaxes the pycryptopp requirement to 0.5.14": http:// revu.ubuntuwire .com/p/ tahoe-lafs . Do we need any further review of Tahoe-LAFS?
Zfec and Pycryptopp are already in the Karmic Queue: https:/ /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ karmic/ +queue
Syncing Foolscap-0.4.2 has two +1 in ticket comments, from StefanPotyra and Iulian: https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ foolscap/ +bug/420270
So, it appears that it is sufficiently reviewed and the Masters of the Universe are willing to make an exception to the Feature Freeze to let it in. :-)