We are monitoring all bug reports to all projects, and most of the users file the API specific bugs against the ubuntu-ui-toolkit project and the tools specific bugs agains the ubuntu-qtcreator-plugins or qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu
The namings are odd, but these projects were not set up in one day by one person :) So some diversity is the result of organic evolution of the SDK.
a) The Ubuntu SDK is a fairly complex project. It has 4 major subdomains: /launchpad. net/ubuntu- ui-toolkit project /code.launchpad .net/~kubuntu- packagers/ kubuntu- packaging/ qtcreator_ 2.7 /launchpad. net/ubuntu- qtcreator- plugins /launchpad. net/qtcreator- plugin- ubuntu
1. The APIs what are delivered from the https:/
2. The stock QtCreator what comes from Qt and lands in our SDK with minimal changes and lives in https:/
3. The Ubuntu plugin to the QtCreator what makes QtC look and behave like Ubuntu SDK. This project lives here https:/
4. The device connectivity scripts and application templates as static content live in https:/
All of these projects are under control of the SDK team (https:/ /launchpad. net/~ubuntu- sdk-team)
We are monitoring all bug reports to all projects, and most of the users file the API specific bugs against the ubuntu-ui-toolkit project and the tools specific bugs agains the ubuntu- qtcreator- plugins or qtcreator- plugin- ubuntu
The namings are odd, but these projects were not set up in one day by one person :) So some diversity is the result of organic evolution of the SDK.
b) The ubuntu-sdk link to the qtcreator is created and the fix is landed on the trunk (https:/ /code.launchpad .net/~ubuntu- sdk-team/ qtcreator- plugin- ubuntu/ trunk) Jenkins and the core-devs will do their jobs and the ubuntu-sdk CLI command will be available in the 0.1-0ubuntu4 in Saucy archive or in the SDK PPA (https:/ /launchpad. net/~ubuntu- sdk-team/ +archive/ ppa/) in version 0.1bzr21saucy0