(In reply to comment #15)
> Were you suggesting to use FT_Stream instead? other than that, giving an
> empty string as a filename to deal with an on-memory font looks not good to
> me at least though.
Yes, I think using FT_Stream is more robust than what we have right now.
(In reply to comment #15)
> Were you suggesting to use FT_Stream instead? other than that, giving an
> empty string as a filename to deal with an on-memory font looks not good to
> me at least though.
Yes, I think using FT_Stream is more robust than what we have right now.