(In reply to comment #13)
> Well, the problem being related to web fonts has been already fixed. no need
> to revert features at all. I'm keeping this open because I want to have a
> new logic or API for web fonts rather than relying on
> undocumented/unintentional behavior.
What kind of logic do you have in mind? I don't think we need to do anything.
(In reply to comment #13) unintentional behavior.
> Well, the problem being related to web fonts has been already fixed. no need
> to revert features at all. I'm keeping this open because I want to have a
> new logic or API for web fonts rather than relying on
> undocumented/
What kind of logic do you have in mind? I don't think we need to do anything.