Comment 40 for bug 1866870
Revision history for this message
| Dr. David Alan Gilbert (dgilbert-h) wrote | #40 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
The vmx things make me wonder about a fix Paolo did a while ago for enabling inidivudal vmx features rather than vmx as a whole; but I can't remember if that was a kernel or qemu fix.
One thing I notice, that may be a red-herring, all of the machine code in the errors are 'f3 0f 1e fb' which is the new 'endbr32' security instruction - but that's really a rep nop, that I thought old instructions can handle anyway??