Comment 5 for bug 855402
Revision history for this message
| Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen (kamstrup) wrote | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
We can't change the Dee ABI at such a fundamental level at this point in the cycle. Even disregarding that I think the Dee API as it is now is totally sensible, it allows for natural stack allocation of the containing array and tricks like that, adding to that that it is totally standard Cism to use arrays like this. In other words: PyGI must be fixed :-) (since it's also a regression)