Comment 3 for bug 1253701
Revision history for this message
| Pedro Manuel Baeza (pedro.baeza) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Hi, Martin, I think you have to reconsider your opinion because:
- Current behaviour is not consistent: product multi-company rule allow this while BoM doesn't.
- This is not a feature request if you consider that this modification allow that consistency and the system must ensure correct defaults.
There's no problem to include the rule on noupdate section if this is a blocking point.
Regards.