We should patch bzrlib to allow exporting a subtree:
02:26 < lifeless> beuno: bzrlib.export.export with a tree object
02:26 < lifeless> beuno: all it needs is a tree decorator that gives you 'doc' as the root rather than '/', for instance
02:28 < beuno> ok, so it would make sense to try and get a patch into bzr, and work on top of that
02:28 < lifeless> we could also tweak the exporter protocol to accept a limit parameter
02:28 < lifeless> rather than using a decorated tree; I don't have an opinion about which is better
Tightly related to bug #246764
We should patch bzrlib to allow exporting a subtree:
02:26 < lifeless> beuno: bzrlib. export. export with a tree object
02:26 < lifeless> beuno: all it needs is a tree decorator that gives you 'doc' as the root rather than '/', for instance
02:28 < beuno> ok, so it would make sense to try and get a patch into bzr, and work on top of that
02:28 < lifeless> we could also tweak the exporter protocol to accept a limit parameter
02:28 < lifeless> rather than using a decorated tree; I don't have an opinion about which is better