The linux-linaro-tracking_origen-exynos4 uses the most recent hwpack from http://snapshots.linaro.org/precise/hwpacks/origen/ .
Indeed, the hwpacks there don't have information about dtb file in the metadata file.
Should we just change "snapshots.linaro.org/precise/hwpacks" to "http://snapshots.linaro.org/precise/hwpacks/leb-origen" for the Linux Linaro Tracking Origen project only (and some more "if"s to the code snippet above), or make it more flexible (add some parameter)?
Would it make sense to create the hwpack (vs just replacing the single kernel image package in the hwpack), as the dtb name specification in the leb-origen hwpack is quite strict (lib/firmware/*-lt-origen/device-tree/exynos4210-origen.dtb), and could lead to boot failures if it changes at some point later?
The linux-linaro- tracking_ origen- exynos4 uses the most recent hwpack from http:// snapshots. linaro. org/precise/ hwpacks/ origen/ .
Indeed, the hwpacks there don't have information about dtb file in the metadata file.
The url to get the hwpack from is (nearly) hardcoded in bazaar. launchpad. net/~linaro- infrastructure/ linaro- ci/lci- build-tools/ view/head: /find_latest. py, near line 88:
http://
if hwpack == "panda" or hwpack == "snowball": snapshots. linaro. org/precise/ hwpacks/ lt-%s/" % hwpack snapshots. linaro. org/precise/ hwpacks/ %s/" % hwpack
url="http://
else:
url="http://
Should we just change "snapshots. linaro. org/precise/ hwpacks" to "http:// snapshots. linaro. org/precise/ hwpacks/ leb-origen" for the Linux Linaro Tracking Origen project only (and some more "if"s to the code snippet above), or make it more flexible (add some parameter)? *-lt-origen/ device- tree/exynos4210 -origen. dtb), and could lead to boot failures if it changes at some point later?
Would it make sense to create the hwpack (vs just replacing the single kernel image package in the hwpack), as the dtb name specification in the leb-origen hwpack is quite strict (lib/firmware/