On Friday 27 May 2011 04:40:44 you wrote:
> Ah, I think there is a layering confusion here.
>
> At the package layer we certainly need to know that there is something
> waiting for an archive admin to approve.
>
> At the queue layer we don't want stuff in a queue that can't be
> processed: they shouldn't be queued for handling by the job runner.
On Friday 27 May 2011 04:40:44 you wrote:
> Ah, I think there is a layering confusion here.
>
> At the package layer we certainly need to know that there is something
> waiting for an archive admin to approve.
>
> At the queue layer we don't want stuff in a queue that can't be
> processed: they shouldn't be queued for handling by the job runner.
Why not?
The PackageCopyJob holds all the context.