On Friday 16 September 2011 02:05:42 you wrote:
> Roberts: Thanks for unduping it (I was not the one that duped it).
It was me.
One of the reasons I did it is because that page needs throwing away and re-
doing. It's an abomination of the highest order and is full of hacks and
workarounds to mitigate the original code that was even more worse at timing
out. Any fixes made to the existing page is just turd polishing.
On Friday 16 September 2011 02:05:42 you wrote:
> Roberts: Thanks for unduping it (I was not the one that duped it).
It was me.
One of the reasons I did it is because that page needs throwing away and re-
doing. It's an abomination of the highest order and is full of hacks and
workarounds to mitigate the original code that was even more worse at timing
out. Any fixes made to the existing page is just turd polishing.