Kevin: the accumulator uses a persist, so it's not just against the memory value.
Thanks for pasting the discussion, the debian bug does indeed raise some interesting discussions.
At any rate, those values are expected to be bytes. The client should never report negative values, and the server should not store it either. I'd rather see us store 0 if it's a negative value.
Kevin: the accumulator uses a persist, so it's not just against the memory value.
Thanks for pasting the discussion, the debian bug does indeed raise some interesting discussions.
At any rate, those values are expected to be bytes. The client should never report negative values, and the server should not store it either. I'd rather see us store 0 if it's a negative value.