Ah, this indeed does not only affect the "link" command but others too. I'm just confused -- why do you call "link" *and* "enable" with an absolute path? You can just do the latter, that implies "link". Or you explicitly "link" and then usually call "enable" on a name only, not a path.
Ah, this indeed does not only affect the "link" command but others too. I'm just confused -- why do you call "link" *and* "enable" with an absolute path? You can just do the latter, that implies "link". Or you explicitly "link" and then usually call "enable" on a name only, not a path.
Either way, https:/ /github. com/systemd/ systemd/ pull/1044 should fix this in a more generic fashion, I'm testing this now.