On 2013-06-17 11:24, Dave Cheney wrote:
> Thanks for working on this John. While I don't have much of a say
> in this, we've done a lot of work to work around philosophical
> differences with the mgo driver. Would a more effective to solve
> this issue be to present the problem to the upstream and have a
> better fix incorporated. It sounds like for scaling, and other
> requirements, we effectively want all the automagic reconnection
> logic in the driver disabled, as our agents already cope with this
> via their retry logic.
>
Well there is still a race condition in the code, so it should get
fixed one way or another.
As for us disabling the pinger entirely, I think that can be a
different bug/patch.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-06-17 11:24, Dave Cheney wrote:
> Thanks for working on this John. While I don't have much of a say
> in this, we've done a lot of work to work around philosophical
> differences with the mgo driver. Would a more effective to solve
> this issue be to present the problem to the upstream and have a
> better fix incorporated. It sounds like for scaling, and other
> requirements, we effectively want all the automagic reconnection
> logic in the driver disabled, as our agents already cope with this
> via their retry logic.
>
Well there is still a race condition in the code, so it should get
fixed one way or another.
As for us disabling the pinger entirely, I think that can be a
different bug/patch.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- www.enigmail. net/
+xy4ACgkQJdeBCY SNAAOvbACcCWrIR qHPVUewtBLBwhL7 jYRT LekPwL28NntTUXx X6bj+UsfVU
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAlG
7k4AoI/
=mT4F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----