Comment 21 for bug 1735839

> (2) could be modified to instead avoid creating symlinks for devices that do not have persistent identifiers.

Existing MAAS users 2.2 through 2.4 will upgrade curtin and new deployments of VMs won't have dnames. Is this acceptable? Won't users file that as a bug?

That may be acceptable if we have a MAAS version released where dnames are stable (and enforced, though the question remains where to enforce this; in curtin or MAAS)?