Comment 5 for bug 1358907

Revision history for this message
Chad Smith (chad.smith) wrote :

Paul, thanks for the deploy on this.

I think the condition of attempting to create a second volume when one with a label postgresql/0 is already present is a separate bug in how we process nova describe-volumes. I'll try to hit this issue on my side today, but it shouldn't be related to this branch. Generally storage tries to leave around the created volume even when the unit dies, so that the storage data isn't lost. Then that same volume gets remounted when a unit of the same name name is restarted/recreated. It looks like something in the nova describe-volumes didn't find a matching volume label for that unit so it tried to create a new one. I'll try reproducing that case with some additional debug logs to see if I can resolve the problem.