Comment 2 for bug 45719

That's good to know. However, if I revert to an older revision and then use revert -r to a new revision I get conflicts. It doesn't work quite how I expected. In svn I can svn update -r and can move my working copy between any revisions. It also does not seem very intuitive have the -r on revert to me. revert is for reverting your local changes that have not been committed. Update seems like the more appropriate command for the -r option - and I think it should allow you to move back and forth through revision history like svn does.