Typo in package description

OK. I did a "Find and Replace All" from Geany to fix the typo. I'll attach the patch and link my branch.

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

The attachment "Fix typo "low-ressource" to "low-resource" in debian/control" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch in the form of a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patch' from the bug report and editing the attachment so that it is not flagged as a patch. Additionally, if you are member of the ubuntu-sponsors team please also unsubscribe the team from this bug report.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by Brian Murray. Please contact him regarding any issues with the action taken in this bug report.]

Thanks for your patch. I agree that it looks correct. I don't think it's worth diverging from Debian for cosmetic issues like this, though, so, instead, I've forwarded your patch to Debian (I'll link the Debian bug to this one once I have its number), and we can close this bug with a sync from Debian later.

This package has been removed from Debian per http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665820, so this patch should either be applied to the Ubuntu package, or the package should be removed from the Ubuntu repository as well. Thoughts?

I attached the patch to fix this bug. I hope it is OK

This patch is for Ubuntu, to correct the issue

It looks good, but I already submitted a patch and Colin Watson said it would be better just to send to Debian (which I already did; see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665820). Good work, but it was already done. Don't get discouraged from fixing other bugs, though!

Er, see comment #6. The status of the Debian bug on Launchpad is a bit misleading - the bug was not fixed, as sugar-0.90 was removed from the Debian repository. Thus, as I said in comment #6, the bug should either be fixed in Ubuntu, or the package should be removed from Ubuntu as well.

I checked in Ubuntu repository, and the bug is not fixed yet. This is why I uploaded the patch for Ubuntu here.

kroq-gar78: It was a pleasure, and I am not discourage

Oh... eh, sorry about that... I completely forgot about your comment, Logan! I agree, it should be fixed or removed from Ubuntu as well.

Again, sorry Alessandro. If you want, assign it back to yourself.

What should I do with this patch? Should I send it upstream?

No; it's not an upstream problem. Leave the patch here, I'd say, and assign the bug to you again. I'll retag this bug with "patch".

Closing, since the package is no longer in new Ubuntu. The typo is still present in newer versions; I've reported it against sugar-base-0.98 in Debian.