[sponsor-patch] crashed with AssertionError in get_open_ubuntu_bug_task()

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.144

---------------
ubuntu-dev-tools (0.144) experimental; urgency=low

  [ Stefano Rivera ]
  * Upload to experimental, due to the freeze
  * submittodebian:
    - Use dpkg-buildpackage instead of debuild. It really doesn't need to run
      lintian twice.
    - Use --include instead of --attach when not using reportbug's internal
      MUA.
  * submittodebian, sponsor-patch:
    - Pass --builder=dpkg-buildpackage to bzr bd, in case the user has
      configured a custom builder that doesn't do source builds (LP: #1019817)
  * seeded-in-ubuntu Inform the user when we couldn't determine binary
    packages built by a source package, as it most recently FTBFS.
  * requestbackport:
    - Avoid duplicate Reverse-Build-Deps when sources build binaries of the
      same name.
    - Explain that backports aren't to fix bugs.
  * sponsor-patch: Don't fall over bugs targetted at the development release
    (LP: #936014)
  * ubuntutools.question: Catch EOF and SIGINT on all input and bail out.
    (LP: #1037488)
  * pull-lp-source: Catch errors parsing JSON we got from DDE (LP: #1059848)
  * syncpackage, requestsync: Check the Release pocket if we can't find an
    Ubuntu package in the requested pocket. (LP: #1069867)

  [ Benjamin Drung ]
  * seeded-in-ubuntu: State in error message that it takes a source package.
    (LP: #1029155)
  * sponsor-patch: Fix crash if Debian patch contains a slash.

  [ Colin Watson ]
  * syncpackage: Default to <current_series>-proposed.

 -- Stefano Rivera <email address hidden> Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:02:29 +0100

Hello Andreas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available in a few hours in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.143ubuntu0.1

---------------
ubuntu-dev-tools (0.143ubuntu0.1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low

  * Cherry-pick some important improvements from 0.144:
    - The Proposed pocket is now the target for all uploads:
      + syncpackage: Default to <current_series>-proposed.
      + syncpackage, requestsync: Check the Release pocket if we can't find an
        Ubuntu package in the requested pocket. (LP: #1069867)
    - pull-lp-source: Catch errors parsing JSON we got from DDE (LP: #1059848)
    - requestbackport: Explain that backports aren't to fix bugs.
    - sponsor-patch: Don't fall over bugs targetted at the development release
      (LP: #936014)
 -- Stefano Rivera <email address hidden> Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:48:47 +0100

Hello Andreas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-dev-tools into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/0.141ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

The fix for this bug has been awaiting testing feedback in the -proposed repository for precise for more than 90 days. Please test this fix and update the bug appropriately with the results. In the event that the fix for this bug is still not verified 15 days from now, the package will be removed from the -proposed repository.

Has someone an open bug as testcase for me?

Benjamin, you can sponsor "my patch" from bug #1153121

i am failing to trigger this bug with original source, did launchpad change/fix this queries? I also fiddled with my test back, so one may want to open a new bug against hello and/or reuse my patch.

I played with your patch and cannot reproduce the bug. sponsor-patch from precise and precise-proposed work as expected.

> Benjamin, you can sponsor "my patch" from bug #1153121

It's targetted at S-series, not raring.

/me re-targets.

I played around with the target series, but all combinations worked as expected.

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-dev-tools - 0.141ubuntu0.1

---------------
ubuntu-dev-tools (0.141ubuntu0.1) precise-proposed; urgency=low

  * Cherry-pick some bug fixes from 0.142-0.145:
    - syncpackage: Default to <current_series>-proposed.
    - syncpackage, requestsync: Check the Release pocket if we can't find an
      Ubuntu package in the requested pocket. (LP: #1069867)
    - pull-lp-source: Catch errors parsing JSON we got from DDE (LP: #1059848)
    - sponsor-patch: Don't fall over bugs targeted at the development release
      (LP: #936014)
    - requestsync: We now sync to proposed (LP: #1073060)
    - syncpackage: syncpackage: Don't throw away release pockets, returning
      correct errors when the source and destination match even though the
      destination release pocket doesn't.
 -- Stefano Rivera <email address hidden> Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:24:56 +0200