Nautilus Terminal

Nautilus 3 not supported?

Bug #841381 reported by Novetica Services on 2011-09-04

This bug affects 3 people

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	Nautilus Terminal	Fix Released	Wishlist	Fabien LOISON	Nautilus Terminal 1.0
	nautilus-terminal (Fedora)	Fix Released	Medium	redhat-bugs #716567

Bug Description

I'm testing oneiric... is nautilus 3 supported? will it be?

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Parker (parker-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-06-24:

#19

Description of problem:

After reboot nautilus-terminal does not start when a nautilus session is opened.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

0.7-2.fc15

How reproducible:

Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install nautilus-terminal
2. Restart
3. Open a nautilus session

Actual results:

Does not appear

Expected results:

A terminal emvedded in nautilus

Additional info:

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-09-05:

Hello,

I'm working on Nautilus Terminal 1.0 that will support Nautilus 3.x :)

Changed in nautilus-terminal:
assignee:	nobody → Fabien LOISON (flozz)
importance:	Undecided → Wishlist
milestone:	none → 1.0
status:	New → In Progress

Revision history for this message

Novetica Services (novetica) wrote on 2011-09-06:

Great news! ;)

God bless yoss (you & open source software)! :D :D :D

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Mario (mario-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-10:

#20

Same problem for me. Actually the Ctrl+Shift+T shortcut should bring up the terminal, but it doesn't happen anything. Even when I start nautilus from a terminal, I don't get any info while using the shortcut.

However, a new version 0.7.1 has been released recently (2011-08-20). Perhaps it solves the problem.

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Hicham (hicham-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-16:

#21

According to upstream, 1.0 will support nautilus3.

0.7.1 is an update supporting nautilus2 only.

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Mario (mario-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-17:

#22

(In reply to comment #2)
> According to upstream, 1.0 will support nautilus3.
>
> 0.7.1 is an update supporting nautilus2 only.

This means, the package is actually unusable on F15 and F16 systems. Is there a convenient way to drop the package from the package database? The current state is somewhat annoying for the users.

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Hicham (hicham-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-17:

#23

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > According to upstream, 1.0 will support nautilus3.
> >
> > 0.7.1 is an update supporting nautilus2 only.
>
> This means, the package is actually unusable on F15 and F16 systems. Is there a
> convenient way to drop the package from the package database? The current state
> is somewhat annoying for the users.

Package won't be removed until it is officially dead upstream, which it isn't. I may try to help with the port to nautilus 3.

Revision history for this message

Alin Andrei (nilarimogard) wrote on 2011-09-27:

I can't wait for this! :D

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-09-27:

Hello,

If you really can't wait, you can install the devel version manually:

mkdir ~/.local/share/nautilus-python/extensions
cd ~/.local/share/nautilus-python/extensions
wget "http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~flozz/nautilus-terminal/1.x/download/head:/nautilus_terminal.py-20110821120001-cufq4xjvn6fhdshs-5/nautilus_terminal.py"

and then restart nautilus. :)

NOTE : The dependences are listed here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~flozz/nautilus-terminal/1.x/view/head:/README

Revision history for this message

Alin Andrei (nilarimogard) wrote on 2011-09-27:

Thank you!

Revision history for this message

Hicham HAOUARI (funnylife-ma) wrote on 2011-09-27:

I will track bzr on fedora 15+, so no manual install is needed

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-27:

#24

nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-27:

#25

nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc15

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-09-28:

@Hicham HAOUARI:

I added the install script in the branch... For packaging you can use it with the -p option:

./install.sh -p /output/folder

see "./install.sh -h" for more informations

Revision history for this message

Vincent Untz (vuntz) wrote on 2011-09-28:

Do not use "import gobject" Edit (513 bytes, text/plain)

This patch is needed, as mentioned in http://www.j5live.com/2011/08/14/announce-pygobject-2-90-1-released-3-0-pre-release/ :

import gobject must be ported as from gi.repository import GObject – this was the recommended way of importing GObject but some code may still have used import gobject. Having both will cause applications to fail because it will load the older 2.28 bindings alongside the 3.0 bindings.

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-09-28:

@Vincent Untz:

I already tried to use the GObject from gi.repository... but there is an issue with Nautilus Python... but you're already aware :p
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660348

Revision history for this message

Vincent Untz (vuntz) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#10

After cheating a bit in nautilus-python, I see this:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/nautilus-python/extensions/nautilus_terminal.py", line 355, in <module>
    class NautilusTerminalProvider(GObject, Nautilus.LocationWidgetProvider):
TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases
    __init__() takes exactly 1 argument (4 given)

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#11

@Vincent Untz:

I have the same error without cheating in nautilus-python :)

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#26

Package nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Revision history for this message

Vincent Untz (vuntz) wrote on 2011-09-29:

#12

Final patch Edit (1.8 KiB, text/plain)

Okay, I fixed everything, and here's the nautilus-terminal part. I'll add the nautilus-python patches to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660348

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-09-29:

#13

Patch applied, it works :)

Revision history for this message

comete (comete) wrote on 2011-09-30:

#14

Thanks for working on this.

I tried installing the extension but I'm having a problem. I still got the error "__could not import GObject__".

I made sure the patch was applied, but the bzr branch has it already.

It seems to come from **python-nautilus** and affecting many projects[1].

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-python/+bug/859104

Revision history for this message

Vincent Untz (vuntz) wrote on 2011-10-04:

#15

comete: you need the nautilus-python patch mentioned in comment 12.

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-10-08:

#27

nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Fedora (fedora-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-10-09:

#28

nautilus-terminal-1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Revision history for this message

comete (comete) wrote on 2011-10-14:

#16

A new nautilus-python is out : https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/amd64/python-nautilus/1.0-0ubuntu2
It should be available soon as an update.

The terminal is active and usable, but I can't hide it.
I tried "Ctrl + Shift + t" but nothing happened.

Also there is no preferences panel.

Otherwise it's great to have it back ! Thanks.

Revision history for this message

comete (comete) wrote on 2011-10-15:

#17

Sorry I had to read the source code to see it : the default shortcut for showing/hidding the terminal is "F4".

Revision history for this message

Fabien LOISON (flozz) wrote on 2011-10-15:

#18

@comete:

Yes it's now F4... :)

Nautius Terminal 1.0 is not an update of the 0.7.x, but a "new" extension rewrote from scratch... So functionalities like preferences or drag&drop will be available later :)

Fabien LOISON (flozz) on 2011-10-17

Changed in nautilus-terminal:
status:	In Progress → Fix Released

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Denis (denis-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-11-01:

#29

Hello, I am using Fedora 16 x86_64 and have 1.0-0.1.8bzr.fc16 version of nautilus-terminal installed. The problem still persist.

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, FLOZz (flozz-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-11-01:

#30

@Denis:

War are your versions of Nautilus and Nautilus Python ?

For Nautilus 3.0, you need:
* Nautilus Terminal (old bzr revision of the 1.x branch or 1.0)
* Nautilus Python 1.0

For Nautilus 3.2, you need:
* Nautilus Terminal 1.0
* Nautilus Python 1.1

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Denis (denis-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-11-01:

#31

nautilus:

Arch : x86_64
Version : 3.2.1
Release : 2.fc16

nautilus-python:

Arch : x86_64
Version : 1.0
Release : 1.fc16

In which repository is nautilus-python 1.1? Rawhide?

I have fedora-updates-testing enabled, and the bug is closed 24 days ago...

Revision history for this message

In Red Hat Bugzilla #716567, Hicham (hicham-redhat-bugs) wrote on 2011-11-02:

#32

(In reply to comment #12)
> nautilus:
>
> Arch : x86_64
> Version : 3.2.1
> Release : 2.fc16
>
> nautilus-python:
>
> Arch : x86_64
> Version : 1.0
> Release : 1.fc16
>
> In which repository is nautilus-python 1.1? Rawhide?
>
> I have fedora-updates-testing enabled, and the bug is closed 24 days ago...