Stable Release Update for ubuntu-docs - natty-updates 1.5.11

Bug #774734 reported by Matthew East
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Natty
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ubuntu-docs

ubuntu-docs was not completely updated for natty in time for the release. Work has now been done to improve that. The intention is to release one stable update now, with subsequent releases to add and update translations.

This first SRU is for version 11.04.3 of ubuntu-docs which I will upload to natty-proposed.

Revision history for this message
Matthew East (mdke) wrote :

Package uploaded to natty-proposed and ~ubuntu-sru subscribed.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

For the record, please don't use "SRU for ..." bugs. Just nominate the actual bugs for natty.

Changed in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Natty):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Please test proposed package

Accepted ubuntu-docs into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

Revision history for this message
Matthew East (mdke) wrote :

The version in natty-proposed works properly.

To respond to comment 2 - the requirement to independently verify each bug included in the SRU upload is rather unnecessary in my opinion for documentation text-only updates. There could be very many bugs fixed in a particular upload, and verifying them individually seems like a bit overkill. So it seems to me to be convenient to use a single SRU bug to collect testing for the -proposed package. But if you think this is inappropriate I will certainly follow the regular process.

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Matthew: The main rationale for using release task instead of separate SRU bugs is to allow original reporters and other affected people to see the call for testing and directly collecting their feeback. It's also easier to keep the related information together and avoid having multiple unrelated patches on one bug.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-docs - 11.04.3

---------------
ubuntu-docs (11.04.3) natty-proposed; urgency=low

  * SRU update bug: LP: #774734
  * Add-applications:
    - Software Sources is now accessed through Software Center
      Giuseppe Terrasi
  * Browser-startpage:
    - changed 10.10 to 11.04, updated weblinks to avoid extra redirects
      LP: #750506. Jeremy Bicha
  * Games:
    - Remove comment about wine not supporting 64 bit. LP: #744984
      Connor Imes
  * Internet:
    - Replace sun-java6-plugin with icedtea6-plugin. LP: #701235
      Connor Imes
    - Changed text for apt install links in web-apps.xml. LP: #721983
      Connor Imes
    - Added directions on checking user privileges for connecting to
      wireless networks. LP: #454994. Connor Imes
  * Musicvideophotos:
    - Remove Realplayer section - Giuseppe Terrasi
  * Serverguide:
    - Fixed type in subversion htpasswd command. LP: #768612
      Connor Imes
    - Removed alternate verification step of Moin Moin installation in
      serverguide that is no longer applicable. Fixes LP: #745553
      Connor Imes
  * General - updates to html build system, not used in binary package
    Connor Imes, Matthew East
 -- Matthew East <email address hidden> Sun, 01 May 2011 10:14:10 +0100

Changed in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Natty):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Matthew East (mdke) wrote : Re: [Bug 774734] Re: Stable Release Update for ubuntu-docs - natty-updates 1.5.11

On 9 May 2011 21:24, Martin Pitt <email address hidden> wrote:
> Matthew: The main rationale for using release task instead of separate
> SRU bugs is to allow original reporters and other affected people to see
> the call for testing and directly collecting their feeback. It's also
> easier to keep the related information together and avoid having
> multiple unrelated patches on one bug.

Thanks Martin, noted. Thanks also for taking care of this during UDS!!

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.