libapr0 - have to conflict with any not package which is not rebuilt against -10

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #267580 http://bugs.debian.org/267580

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:38:33 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libapr0 - have to conflict with any not package which is not rebuilt against -10

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.50-10
Severity: grave

libapr0 have to conflict against any package which have not been rebuilt
against -10.

Bastian

--=20
You're too beautiful to ignore. Too much woman.
  -- Kirk to Yeoman Rand, "The Enemy Within", stardate unknown

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkEp5UkACgkQnw66O/MvCNHrJACeJk+ibkHEugjtKslGw16yQmZ0
FvkAnjgDQTyU6nXaHDUnQZr8m7+EbdVj
=kpY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--

Message-ID: <1b8a01c48916$96241750$0300000a@0c3.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:39:16 +1000
From: "Adam Conrad" <adconrad@0c3.net>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libapr0 - have to conflict with any not package which is not rebuilt against -10

We've been advised by the release team that due to the short window of
ABI breakage, we should just blindly pretend -9 never happened.
Everything in unstable has now been rebuilt against -10, and nothing in
testing was ever built against -9 to start with.

... Adam

post-warty version