lt u8500 hwpack builds hwpack without -lt

Hi Jamie, is it the name that is wrong, or the offspring project name etc?

Thanks,

James

I'm not sure this is much of an issue. The only naming mismatch I see is that the final filename is linaro-u8500 in the /hwpacks dir. The branch name contains lt-* (https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/linaro-images/hwpack.natty.linaro-lt-u8500) and Offspring produces lt-* hwpacks so there is little confusion. Ideally we would rename the file to lt-linaro-u8500 to be clear though.

This hwpack is clearly a lt-* output as it uses LT ppa's.

On closer inspection all files are name correctly apart from the tarball which is (for example):

hwpack_linaro-u8500_20110317-0_armel_unsupported.tar.gz

This looks like an Offspring issue. Let me investigate further.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:07:09 -0000, Jamie Bennett <email address hidden> wrote:
> On closer inspection all files are name correctly apart from the tarball
> which is (for example):
>
> hwpack_linaro-u8500_20110317-0_armel_unsupported.tar.gz
>
> This looks like an Offspring issue. Let me investigate further.

Nope, that's an issue with the file I pointed to in bzr.

The hwpack config states that the hwpack name is "linaro-u8500",
contradicting everything else.

Just adding -lt to that line in the first stanza of the file in bzr
would fix it on the next build.

Thanks,

James

Set to invalid. We don't produce u8500 hwpack anymore.