*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
xmltex (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
xmltex (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #262395 http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #1 |
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #2 |
I can't reproduce this in Warty; can you provide a test case?
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #3 |
Seems to not be reproducible on other boxes (I don't have it on my warty box,
and I'm the only reporter in the Debian BTS) but it's still here on my
debian+wartygnome box. BTW I don't really know how to provide more details, the
failure log is attached in the BTS.
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Russ Allbery (rra-debian) wrote : | #4 |
> Package: xmltex
> Version: 1.9-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: broke the upgrades
>
> Need to get 0B/196kB of archives.
> After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> (Reading database ... 132069 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace xmltex 1.9-8 (using .../archives/
> Unpacking replacement xmltex ...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/
> texhash: Updating /var/cache/
> texhash: Done.
> Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ...
> Didn't run update-fmtutil as you requested!
README.Debian in xmltex explains this issue, but you may not be able to
easily get at that either while you have this problem.
The last line there is the key. I believe this means that you have
automatic updating of your fmtutil configuration turned off in the
tetex-bin configuration, which means that installation of new formats will
fail in the way that you're seeing.
You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
The package installs correctly for me (I have this enabled).
--
Russ Allbery (<email address hidden>) <http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #5 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:53:09 -0700
From: Russ Allbery <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't
work
> Package: xmltex
> Version: 1.9-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: broke the upgrades
>
> Need to get 0B/196kB of archives.
> After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> (Reading database ... 132069 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace xmltex 1.9-8 (using .../archives/
> Unpacking replacement xmltex ...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/
> texhash: Updating /var/cache/
> texhash: Done.
> Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ...
> Didn't run update-fmtutil as you requested!
README.Debian in xmltex explains this issue, but you may not be able to
easily get at that either while you have this problem.
The last line there is the key. I believe this means that you have
automatic updating of your fmtutil configuration turned off in the
tetex-bin configuration, which means that installation of new formats will
fail in the way that you're seeing.
You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
The package installs correctly for me (I have this enabled).
--
Russ Allbery (<email address hidden>) <http://
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work | #6 |
Le mardi 03 août 2004 à 18:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.
BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
turned to off, I let the bug open.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-Id: <1091606097.
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 09:54:57 +0200
From: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
To: Russ Allbery <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't
work
Le mardi 03 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 18:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a =E9crit :
> You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.=20
BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
turned to off, I let the bug open.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #8 |
Not RC, only affects an unusual non-default configuration
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Graham Wilson (bob-decoy) wrote : | #9 |
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:54:57AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 03 août 2004 à 18:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> > configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
>
> Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.
> BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
> turned to off, I let the bug open.
Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
this.
$ cat /usr/share/
------
Debian README file for xmltex
------
Installation of xmltex will fail if automatic generation of fmtutil.cnf
is not enabled. This can be enabled by reconfiguring tetex-bin. As root,
do the following:
# dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin
Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
REMARK: Automatic installation of some other TeX related packages could
fail in this case.
--
gram
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : | #10 |
it's a non-default configuration ? I don't remember changing a debconf choice in
this area ...
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote : | #11 |
If you are getting a different default, there must be another bug somewhere.
See /var/lib/
Template: tetex-bin/fmtutil
Type: boolean
Default: true
Description: Use update-fmtutil to automatically generate fmtutil.cnf?
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #12 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:56:14 -0500
From: Graham Wilson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Russ Allbery <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:54:57AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 03 ao�04 �8:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a �it :
> > You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> > configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
>
> Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.
> BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
> turned to off, I let the bug open.
Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
this.
$ cat /usr/share/
------
Debian README file for xmltex
------
Installation of xmltex will fail if automatic generation of fmtutil.cnf
is not enabled. This can be enabled by reconfiguring tetex-bin. As root,
do the following:
# dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin
Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
REMARK: Automatic installation of some other TeX related packages could
fail in this case.
--
gram
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work) | #13 |
reopen 262395
severity 262395 important
thanks
Le mercredi 04 août 2004 à 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
écrit :
> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
> this.
>
> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.
Do you really think than an user will remember his previous tetex-bin
installation notes ? Most of users don't even read the installation
logs ..
And you can't be confident on the fact that people will go to read the
README.Debian when the installation fail.
I'm reopening the bug with the severity set to important since it
doesn't fail for everybody.
Cheers,
Sebastien bacher
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #14 |
Message-Id: <1091649256.
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:54:16 +0200
From: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't
make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work)
reopen 262395
severity 262395 important
thanks
Le mercredi 04 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
=E9crit :
> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
> this.
>=20
> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.=20
Do you really think than an user will remember his previous tetex-bin
installation notes ? Most of users don't even read the installation
logs ..
And you can't be confident on the fact that people will go to read the
README.Debian when the installation fail.
I'm reopening the bug with the severity set to important since it
doesn't fail for everybody.
Cheers,
Sebastien bacher
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Frank Küster (frank-kuesterei) wrote : Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work) | #15 |
Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:
> reopen 262395
> severity 262395 important
> thanks
>
> Le mercredi 04 août 2004 à 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
> écrit :
>
>> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
>> this.
>>
>> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
>> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
>
> I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
> purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
> what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.
Please note that the tetex-bin package has changed its defaults
meanwhile. It is still possible to deselect automatic generation of
fmtutil.cnf, but the new default is now to generate it. Furthermore,
people upgrading from old installations have been prompted again with
the new behavior selected as default, and noninteractive installations
(or machines with too low debconf priority) have been automatically
changed to generate fmtutil.cnf.
I think this lowers the severity of the bug, because now it should only
affect people who deliberately chose to override the default, reading
the warning:
,----
| However, installation of some TeX-related packages will fail unless
| you accept this option.
`----
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #16 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:49:46 +0200
From: <email address hidden> (=?iso-
To: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't make
xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work)
Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:
> reopen 262395
> severity 262395 important
> thanks
>
> Le mercredi 04 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
> =E9crit :
>
>> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
>> this.
>>=20
>> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
>> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
>
> I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
> purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
> what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.=20
Please note that the tetex-bin package has changed its defaults
meanwhile. It is still possible to deselect automatic generation of
fmtutil.cnf, but the new default is now to generate it. Furthermore,
people upgrading from old installations have been prompted again with
the new behavior selected as default, and noninteractive installations
(or machines with too low debconf priority) have been automatically
changed to generate fmtutil.cnf.
I think this lowers the severity of the bug, because now it should only
affect people who deliberately chose to override the default, reading
the warning:
,----
| However, installation of some TeX-related packages will fail unless
| you accept this option.
`----
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Julian Gilbey (jdg-polya) wrote : Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex | #17 |
reassign 306595 xmltex
severity 306595 important
merge 306595 262395
severity 262395 serious
tags 262395 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > Could you give us the contents of the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/
>
> Here is what I have:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4203 2005-03-30 10:25 00tetex.cnf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 269 2002-12-10 14:02 40jadetex.cnf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97 2002-11-01 20:20 40xmltex.cnf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97 2002-10-29 15:30 40xmltex.
>
> Thank you for the hint ! Cleaning-up the old cruft:
>
> mv 40jadetex.
>
> fixed the jadetex problem. This is strange because I never touch those
> files and I always choose to use the new version from the maintainer.
>
> Now I only have a problem with xmltex (see below).
>
> # cat 40xmltex.cnf
> xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
> pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
>
> > and tell us which version of xmltex and jadetex you're using?
>
> The latest one in sid+experimental:
>
> ii jadetex 3.13-6 generator of printable output from SGML or XML using J
> ii xmltex 1.9-8 TeX package for processing XML files
This is bug #262395, so reassigning there.
This is a serious bug as it will break all installations with the
current (testing and unstable) tetex packages. Patch: edit
/usr/share/
xmltex latex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdflatex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
i.e., changing "tex" -> "latex" and "pdftex" to "pdflatex".
or
xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
The latter is better, as it works whatever the setting of latex is.
Julian
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : remove experimental tag | #18 |
tags 262395 - experimental
tags 306595 - experimental
thanks
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Bug#262395: fixed in xmltex 1.9-9 | #19 |
Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-9
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xmltex_
to pool/main/
xmltex_1.9-9.dsc
to pool/main/
xmltex_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> (supplier of updated xmltex package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 17:24:47 -0500
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden>
Description:
xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 258974 262395 268717 306595
Changes:
xmltex (1.9-9) unstable; urgency=high
.
* debian/control: Added myself as Uploader
* rebuild with latest build tools
(closes: Bug#268717, Bug#258974)
* fixed broken installation:
(closes: Bug#262395, Bug#306595)
* debian/
* debian/postinst: replaced '.fmt' by '.efmt'
* debian/postrm: replaced '.fmt' by '.efmt'
* debian/control: upgraded to Debian Policy 3.6.1 (no changes)
Files:
5b1fce2a83c547
ead8d3adc57d5a
8b9add319dce95
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQpuc1j6
BZmi0cIhl4s89iY
saRUhghaPBbWupa
yx0o09GVEqY=
=J1jI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : tagging 306595 | #20 |
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 306595 sarge
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex | #21 |
reopen 262395
tags 262395 + sid
thanks
Hi,
xmltex 1.9-9 does not fix the postinst failure:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-9) ...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/
texhash: Updating /var/lib/
texhash: Updating /var/lib/
texhash: Updating /var/cache/
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
Trying fmtutil --all
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
fmtutil: /var/lib/
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
*** see /tmp/xmltex-
dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
This is up-to-date unstable on powerpc. I'll be happy to do any
further testing.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Browaeys-alban (browaeys-alban) wrote : | #22 |
This is a followup for your report:
http://
The report end up with :
> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
> *** see /tmp/xmltex-
> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
the full error log is in the generated file . Here
"/tmp/xmltex-
deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .
Regards
Alban
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Vincent Lefevre (vincent-vinc17) wrote : | #23 |
severity 262395 grave
thanks
The severity should be at least grave, as the upgrade breaks the
system, and so that the bug can be seen by apt-listbugs, as said
in bug #311425.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <email address hidden> - Web: <http://
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : | #24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
<email address hidden> writes:
> This is a followup for your report:
> http://
>
> The report end up with :
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/
>> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
>> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
>> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
>> *** see /tmp/xmltex-
>> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
>
> the full error log is in the generated file . Here
> "/tmp/xmltex-
> deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .
Sorry, but I'm afraid that /tmp is tmpfs, and it was lost after
shutting down. It succeeded later, and I've tried downgrading to -8
and upgrading again, and it now works fine.
So there's still a fault here which can cause errors on upgrades, but
I'm not sure what the cause is, or if it will affect woody upgrades.
I'll try purging all of tetex and trying again.
Thanks,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://
iD8DBQFCnXMdVcF
pUfzDBrJ5+
=D1Rg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : | #25 |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> <email address hidden> writes:
>
> > This is a followup for your report:
> > http://
> >
> > The report end up with :
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/
> >> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> >> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> >> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
> >> *** see /tmp/xmltex-
> >> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
> >
> > the full error log is in the generated file . Here
> > "/tmp/xmltex-
> > deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .
>
> Sorry, but I'm afraid that /tmp is tmpfs, and it was lost after
> shutting down. It succeeded later, and I've tried downgrading to -8
> and upgrading again, and it now works fine.
>
> So there's still a fault here which can cause errors on upgrades, but
> I'm not sure what the cause is, or if it will affect woody upgrades.
> I'll try purging all of tetex and trying again.
No luck. It reinstalled fine.
--
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : tagging 262395, severity of 262395 is important | #26 |
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 262395 unreproducible
severity 262395 important
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : ah, nice problem... | #27 |
I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
cat /etc/texmf/
xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
cat /usr/share/
xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
Apparently last update did not fix for some reason (dunno why, surely I
did not altered those files, so update simply fails to do it itself)
So, postinst wrongly suppose that fmtutil --all will create a .efmt file.
A decent hack should check for .fmt or .efmt presence or force both
formats creationi, without relying on current configuration...
That could be a tetex-bin issue or a xmltetex one.
For sure I see jadetex check one of them, and maybe it has sense.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : | #28 |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
> xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
>
> cat /etc/texmf/
> xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
> pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
>
> cat /usr/share/
> xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
> pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
>
> Apparently last update did not fix for some reason (dunno why, surely I
> did not altered those files, so update simply fails to do it itself)
>
> So, postinst wrongly suppose that fmtutil --all will create a .efmt file.
> A decent hack should check for .fmt or .efmt presence or force both
> formats creationi, without relying on current configuration...
> That could be a tetex-bin issue or a xmltetex one.
> For sure I see jadetex check one of them, and maybe it has sense.
>
Uhm just an hint, maybe installconf should be used a bit more in
the postinst file :) ?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : [frankie@debian.org: ah, nice problem...] | #29 |
----- Forwarded message from Francesco Paolo Lovergine <email address hidden> -----
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: ah, nice problem...
I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
cat /etc/texmf/
xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
cat /usr/share/
xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
Apparently last update did not fix for some reason (dunno why, surely I
did not altered those files, so update simply fails to do it itself)
So, postinst wrongly suppose that fmtutil --all will create a .efmt file.
A decent hack should check for .fmt or .efmt presence or force both
formats creationi, without relying on current configuration...
That could be a tetex-bin issue or a xmltetex one.
For sure I see jadetex check one of them, and maybe it has sense.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : can be reproduced | #30 |
tags 262395 - unreproducible
thanks
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Merge postinst failure | #31 |
merge 306595 311557
severity 306595 grave
thanks
--
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Merge related | #32 |
merge 306595 311557
thanks
--
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Don Armstrong (don-debian) wrote : patch to fix this by checking to see whether efmt or fmt is supposed to be made | #33 |
The following rather trivial patch seems to clear up this issue here.
[Someone better at shell could probably make it slightly cleaner...
just thank $DEITY that I didn't decide to write it in perl. ;-)]
The basic idea is just to see if fmtutil is going to make an efmt or
fmt, and then check for the existence of the appropriate file.
Don Armstrong
--
Of course, there are ceases where only a rare individual will have the
vision to perceive a system which governs many people's lives; a
system which had never before even been recognized as a system; then
such people often devote their lives to convincing other people that
the system really is there and that it aught to be exited from.
-- Douglas R. Hofstadter _G� Escher Bach. Eternal Golden Braid_
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Don Armstrong (don-debian) wrote : | #34 |
Eugene Konev reminded me (in #debian-bugs) that a fix is needed to the
postrm as well. Since kpsewhich can return both fmt and efmt, the
trivial thing is to look for both:
# remove fmt and efmt files
XMLTEXFMT=
PDFXMLTEXFMT=
rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT
The more complete attached patch does that.
Don Armstrong
--
America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The
world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar
stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of
socially responsible centurions.
-- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Don Armstrong (don-debian) wrote : and yet another minor issue | #35 |
Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft
and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to
fix):
XMLTEXFMT=
PDFXMLTEXFMT=
LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true
rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT
# remove fmt file logs
rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/
Don Armstrong
--
America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The
world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar
stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of
socially responsible centurions.
-- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex | #36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Don,
I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of
perfection, but the patch looks clean and I couldn't see any obvious
errors.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://
iD8DBQFCntK+
L/TVzS0KLEpkx80
=LdSX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Re: Bug#262395: and yet another minor issue | #37 |
Don Armstrong (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft
> and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to
> fix):
>
>
> XMLTEXFMT=
> PDFXMLTEXFMT=
> LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true
> rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT
>
> # remove fmt file logs
> rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/
>
>
> Don Armstrong
Don,
Many thanks for the patches. I'm building a new package as we speak.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Re: Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex | #38 |
Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Don,
>
> I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
> worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
> with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of
> perfection, but the patch looks clean and I couldn't see any obvious
> errors.
>
>
> Regards,
> Roger
Hi,
I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
Don, thanks again for the patches.
Roger, thanks for testing them.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : | #39 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
> I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
Does the woody upgrade need testing?
- --
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://
iD8DBQFCn2W/
KWo86/VIeaFXx2p
=1zP+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : | #40 |
Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
>
> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
>
> Does the woody upgrade need testing?
That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : | #41 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
> Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
>>
>> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
>> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
>>
>> Does the woody upgrade need testing?
>
> That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means.
Done with no problems to report.
I did a base woody install, installed tetex+xmltex and dist-upgraded
to sarge. No errors on upgrade.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://
iD8DBQFCn4dcVcF
sRmHkS6Df47FapL
=sQX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Don Armstrong (dondelelcaro) wrote : | #42 |
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
> > Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> >> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
> >>
> >> Does the woody upgrade need testing?
> >
> > That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means.
>
> Done with no problems to report.
>
> I did a base woody install, installed tetex+xmltex and dist-upgraded
> to sarge. No errors on upgrade.
Nice. Thanks, Roger, for testing that out.
Thanks, Ardo, for taking the time to vett the patches and make the upload.
Don Armstrong
--
She was alot like starbucks.
IE, generic and expensive.
-- hugh macleod http://
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Bug#262395: fixed in xmltex 1.9-10 | #43 |
Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xmltex_
to pool/main/
xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
to pool/main/
xmltex_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> (supplier of updated xmltex package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:52:41 -0500
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden>
Description:
xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 262395 306595 311405 311415 311557
Changes:
xmltex (1.9-10) unstable; urgency=high
.
* debian/
(closes: Bug#262395, Bug#306595, Bug#311405, Bug#311415, Bug#311557)
(patches provided by Don Armstrong <email address hidden>. Thanks!)
Files:
95328a93a7bbc1
9d795b6af6363e
d8e9136ce82179
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQp+
nr6oODPVMlWMf7Z
3ezi4Z90qQo4YiY
LXGEMmqvnLw=
=h0H4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Not yet fixed in sarge | #44 |
tags 311557 - sid
reopen 311557
thanks
--
Roger Leigh
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
In Debian Bug tracker #262395, Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Bug#311557: fixed in xmltex 1.9-10 | #45 |
Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xmltex_
to pool/main/
xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
to pool/main/
xmltex_
to pool/main/
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> (supplier of updated xmltex package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:52:41 -0500
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden>
Description:
xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 262395 306595 311405 311415 311557
Changes:
xmltex (1.9-10) unstable; urgency=high
.
* debian/
(closes: Bug#262395, Bug#306595, Bug#311405, Bug#311415, Bug#311557)
(patches provided by Don Armstrong <email address hidden>. Thanks!)
Files:
95328a93a7bbc1
9d795b6af6363e
d8e9136ce82179
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQp+
nr6oODPVMlWMf7Z
3ezi4Z90qQo4YiY
LXGEMmqvnLw=
=h0H4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Daniel Robitaille (robitaille) wrote : | #46 |
This bug (debian #262395) is fixed in xmltex (1.9-10), available in Breezy.
Changed in xmltex: | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #262395 http:// bugs.debian. org/262395