*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

Bug #7250 reported by Debian Bug Importer
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
xmltex (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
xmltex (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #262395 http://bugs.debian.org/262395

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #262395 http://bugs.debian.org/262395

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

I can't reproduce this in Warty; can you provide a test case?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Seems to not be reproducible on other boxes (I don't have it on my warty box,
and I'm the only reporter in the Debian BTS) but it's still here on my
debian+wartygnome box. BTW I don't really know how to provide more details, the
failure log is attached in the BTS.

Revision history for this message
In , Russ Allbery (rra-debian) wrote :

> Package: xmltex
> Version: 1.9-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: broke the upgrades
>
> Need to get 0B/196kB of archives.
> After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> (Reading database ... 132069 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace xmltex 1.9-8 (using .../archives/xmltex_1.9-8_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement xmltex ...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
> texhash: Done.
> Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ...
> Didn't run update-fmtutil as you requested!

README.Debian in xmltex explains this issue, but you may not be able to
easily get at that either while you have this problem.

The last line there is the key. I believe this means that you have
automatic updating of your fmtutil configuration turned off in the
tetex-bin configuration, which means that installation of new formats will
fail in the way that you're seeing.

You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.

The package installs correctly for me (I have this enabled).

--
Russ Allbery (<email address hidden>) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:53:09 -0700
From: Russ Allbery <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't
 work

> Package: xmltex
> Version: 1.9-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: broke the upgrades
>
> Need to get 0B/196kB of archives.
> After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> (Reading database ... 132069 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace xmltex 1.9-8 (using .../archives/xmltex_1.9-8_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement xmltex ...
> texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
> texhash: Done.
> Setting up xmltex (1.9-8) ...
> Didn't run update-fmtutil as you requested!

README.Debian in xmltex explains this issue, but you may not be able to
easily get at that either while you have this problem.

The last line there is the key. I believe this means that you have
automatic updating of your fmtutil configuration turned off in the
tetex-bin configuration, which means that installation of new formats will
fail in the way that you're seeing.

You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.

The package installs correctly for me (I have this enabled).

--
Russ Allbery (<email address hidden>) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Revision history for this message
In , Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

Le mardi 03 août 2004 à 18:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :

> You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.

Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.
BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
turned to off, I let the bug open.

Cheers,

Sebastien Bacher

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <1091606097.6432.5.camel@seb128>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 09:54:57 +0200
From: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
To: Russ Allbery <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't
 work

Le mardi 03 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 18:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a =E9crit :

> You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.

Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.=20
BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
turned to off, I let the bug open.

Cheers,

Sebastien Bacher

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Not RC, only affects an unusual non-default configuration

Revision history for this message
In , Graham Wilson (bob-decoy) wrote :

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:54:57AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 03 août 2004 à 18:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> > configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
>
> Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.
> BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
> turned to off, I let the bug open.

Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
this.

 $ cat /usr/share/doc/xmltex/README.Debian
 -----------------------------
 Debian README file for xmltex
 -----------------------------

 Installation of xmltex will fail if automatic generation of fmtutil.cnf
 is not enabled. This can be enabled by reconfiguring tetex-bin. As root,
 do the following:

  # dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin

 Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
 configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:

  REMARK: Automatic installation of some other TeX related packages could
  fail in this case.

--
gram

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

it's a non-default configuration ? I don't remember changing a debconf choice in
this area ...

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

If you are getting a different default, there must be another bug somewhere.

See /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-bin.templates

Template: tetex-bin/fmtutil
Type: boolean
Default: true
Description: Use update-fmtutil to automatically generate fmtutil.cnf?

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:56:14 -0500
From: Graham Wilson <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Russ Allbery <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:54:57AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 03 ao�04 �8:53 -0700, Russ Allbery a �it :
> > You can fix this by running dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin and then
> > configuring it to update fmtutil.cnf automatically.
>
> Yes, right the installation is fine now, thanks.
> BTW the xmltex installation should not fail even if this option is
> turned to off, I let the bug open.

Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
this.

 $ cat /usr/share/doc/xmltex/README.Debian
 -----------------------------
 Debian README file for xmltex
 -----------------------------

 Installation of xmltex will fail if automatic generation of fmtutil.cnf
 is not enabled. This can be enabled by reconfiguring tetex-bin. As root,
 do the following:

  # dpkg-reconfigure -p low tetex-bin

 Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
 configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:

  REMARK: Automatic installation of some other TeX related packages could
  fail in this case.

--
gram

Revision history for this message
In , Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote : Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work)

reopen 262395
severity 262395 important
thanks

Le mercredi 04 août 2004 à 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
écrit :

> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
> this.
>
> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:

I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.

Do you really think than an user will remember his previous tetex-bin
installation notes ? Most of users don't even read the installation
logs ..
And you can't be confident on the fact that people will go to read the
README.Debian when the installation fail.

I'm reopening the bug with the severity set to important since it
doesn't fail for everybody.

Cheers,

Sebastien bacher

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <1091649256.6518.51.camel@seb128>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:54:16 +0200
From: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't
 make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work)

reopen 262395
severity 262395 important
thanks

Le mercredi 04 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
=E9crit :

> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
> this.
>=20
> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:

I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.=20

Do you really think than an user will remember his previous tetex-bin
installation notes ? Most of users don't even read the installation
logs ..
And you can't be confident on the fact that people will go to read the
README.Debian when the installation fail.

I'm reopening the bug with the severity set to important since it
doesn't fail for everybody.

Cheers,

Sebastien bacher

Revision history for this message
In , Frank Küster (frank-kuesterei) wrote : Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work)

Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:

> reopen 262395
> severity 262395 important
> thanks
>
> Le mercredi 04 août 2004 à 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
> écrit :
>
>> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
>> this.
>>
>> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
>> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
>
> I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
> purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
> what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.

Please note that the tetex-bin package has changed its defaults
meanwhile. It is still possible to deselect automatic generation of
fmtutil.cnf, but the new default is now to generate it. Furthermore,
people upgrading from old installations have been prompted again with
the new behavior selected as default, and noninteractive installations
(or machines with too low debconf priority) have been automatically
changed to generate fmtutil.cnf.

I think this lowers the severity of the bug, because now it should only
affect people who deliberately chose to override the default, reading
the warning:

,----
| However, installation of some TeX-related packages will fail unless
| you accept this option.
`----

Regards, Frank

--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:49:46 +0200
From: <email address hidden> (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
To: Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#262395 acknowledged by developer (Re: *** ERROR: can't make
 xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work)

Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:

> reopen 262395
> severity 262395 important
> thanks
>
> Le mercredi 04 ao=FBt 2004 =E0 11:03 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
> =E9crit :
>
>> Yes, it should fail. The postinst of tetex-bin even warns you about
>> this.
>>=20
>> Note that this is a known issue with the Debian teTeX packages; the
>> configuration dialogs displayed at package installation time say:
>
> I strongly disagree, a package installation should never fail on
> purpose. Catch the error, ignore it, at least display a message to say
> what's needed but don't keep a broken postinst on purpose.=20

Please note that the tetex-bin package has changed its defaults
meanwhile. It is still possible to deselect automatic generation of
fmtutil.cnf, but the new default is now to generate it. Furthermore,
people upgrading from old installations have been prompted again with
the new behavior selected as default, and noninteractive installations
(or machines with too low debconf priority) have been automatically
changed to generate fmtutil.cnf.

I think this lowers the severity of the bug, because now it should only
affect people who deliberately chose to override the default, reading
the warning:

,----
| However, installation of some TeX-related packages will fail unless
| you accept this option.
`----

Regards, Frank

--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
In , Julian Gilbey (jdg-polya) wrote : Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

reassign 306595 xmltex
severity 306595 important
merge 306595 262395
severity 262395 serious
tags 262395 +patch
thanks

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > Could you give us the contents of the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/
>
> Here is what I have:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4203 2005-03-30 10:25 00tetex.cnf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 269 2002-12-10 14:02 40jadetex.cnf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97 2002-11-01 20:20 40xmltex.cnf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97 2002-10-29 15:30 40xmltex.cnf.disable
>
> Thank you for the hint ! Cleaning-up the old cruft:
>
> mv 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist 40jadetex.cnf
>
> fixed the jadetex problem. This is strange because I never touch those
> files and I always choose to use the new version from the maintainer.
>
> Now I only have a problem with xmltex (see below).
>
> # cat 40xmltex.cnf
> xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
> pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
>
> > and tell us which version of xmltex and jadetex you're using?
>
> The latest one in sid+experimental:
>
> ii jadetex 3.13-6 generator of printable output from SGML or XML using J
> ii xmltex 1.9-8 TeX package for processing XML files

This is bug #262395, so reassigning there.

This is a serious bug as it will break all installations with the
current (testing and unstable) tetex packages. Patch: edit
/usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex/templates/40xmltex.cnf to read:

xmltex latex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdflatex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini

i.e., changing "tex" -> "latex" and "pdftex" to "pdflatex".

or

xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini

The latter is better, as it works whatever the setting of latex is.

   Julian

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : remove experimental tag

tags 262395 - experimental
tags 306595 - experimental
thanks
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Bug#262395: fixed in xmltex 1.9-9

Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmltex_1.9-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-9.diff.gz
xmltex_1.9-9.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-9.dsc
xmltex_1.9-9_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-9_all.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> (supplier of updated xmltex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 17:24:47 -0500
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden>
Description:
 xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 258974 262395 268717 306595
Changes:
 xmltex (1.9-9) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * debian/control: Added myself as Uploader
   * rebuild with latest build tools
     (closes: Bug#268717, Bug#258974)
   * fixed broken installation:
     (closes: Bug#262395, Bug#306595)
     * debian/40xmltex.cnf: replaced 'tex' by 'etex' and 'pdftex' by 'pdfetex'
     * debian/postinst: replaced '.fmt' by '.efmt'
     * debian/postrm: replaced '.fmt' by '.efmt'
   * debian/control: upgraded to Debian Policy 3.6.1 (no changes)
Files:
 5b1fce2a83c5473d1dcec4bfeffbf90f 820 tex optional xmltex_1.9-9.dsc
 ead8d3adc57d5a2cacb3a0888741c8e1 10311 tex optional xmltex_1.9-9.diff.gz
 8b9add319dce957a74f87803f8a78ff5 196344 tex optional xmltex_1.9-9_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQpuc1j6XMRfcxSjpAQKAZgQAupUTw6VxK/IxYJvqBnPXMXC7ahDhTZJK
BZmi0cIhl4s89iYxLU117AH9mOc7qL3dvL7Mp/ckyLj/xeAPyDEOv2ijV7+UKLOy
saRUhghaPBbWupaHa31upf+2c4fwolGB4/DnbE8a819iBhcERQNFkc5nuCbRQ2fa
yx0o09GVEqY=
=J1jI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : tagging 306595

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 306595 sarge

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

reopen 262395
tags 262395 + sid
thanks

Hi,

xmltex 1.9-9 does not fix the postinst failure:

Setting up xmltex (1.9-9) ...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/xmltex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfxmltex.fmt installed.
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
Trying fmtutil --all
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/lambda.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/amstex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfxmltex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/xmltex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/elatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/jadetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
*** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW for details
dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):

This is up-to-date unstable on powerpc. I'll be happy to do any
further testing.

Regards,
Roger

--
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Revision history for this message
In , Browaeys-alban (browaeys-alban) wrote :

This is a followup for your report:
http://bugs.debian.org/262395

The report end up with :
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
> *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW for details
> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):

the full error log is in the generated file . Here
"/tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW". Could you post this file or if
deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .

Regards
Alban

Revision history for this message
In , Vincent Lefevre (vincent-vinc17) wrote :

severity 262395 grave
thanks

The severity should be at least grave, as the upgrade breaks the
system, and so that the bug can be seen by apt-listbugs, as said
in bug #311425.

--
Vincent Lefèvre <email address hidden> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

<email address hidden> writes:

> This is a followup for your report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/262395
>
> The report end up with :
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
>> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
>> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
>> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
>> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
>> *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW for details
>> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
>
> the full error log is in the generated file . Here
> "/tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW". Could you post this file or if
> deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .

Sorry, but I'm afraid that /tmp is tmpfs, and it was lost after
shutting down. It succeeded later, and I've tried downgrading to -8
and upgrading again, and it now works fine.

So there's still a fault here which can cause errors on upgrades, but
I'm not sure what the cause is, or if it will affect woody upgrades.
I'll try purging all of tetex and trying again.

Thanks,
Roger

- --
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFCnXMdVcFcaSW/uEgRAr1dAJsFkd2rjGDfrolOMyYm+3A/jQJV+wCfesyR
pUfzDBrJ5+8Y8cGrJ7iOk3U=
=D1Rg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote :

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:34:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> <email address hidden> writes:
>
> > This is a followup for your report:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/262395
> >
> > The report end up with :
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.efmt installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
> >> fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
> >> ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> >> ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
> >> *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
> >> *** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW for details
> >> dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
> >
> > the full error log is in the generated file . Here
> > "/tmp/xmltex-postinst.qiqJtW". Could you post this file or if
> > deleted rerun the upgrade process and send the new one .
>
> Sorry, but I'm afraid that /tmp is tmpfs, and it was lost after
> shutting down. It succeeded later, and I've tried downgrading to -8
> and upgrading again, and it now works fine.
>
> So there's still a fault here which can cause errors on upgrades, but
> I'm not sure what the cause is, or if it will affect woody upgrades.
> I'll try purging all of tetex and trying again.

No luck. It reinstalled fine.

--
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Revision history for this message
In , Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : tagging 262395, severity of 262395 is important

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
tags 262395 unreproducible
severity 262395 important

Revision history for this message
In , Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : ah, nice problem...

I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:

cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini

cat /usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex/templates/40xmltex.cnf
xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini

Apparently last update did not fix for some reason (dunno why, surely I
did not altered those files, so update simply fails to do it itself)

So, postinst wrongly suppose that fmtutil --all will create a .efmt file.
A decent hack should check for .fmt or .efmt presence or force both
formats creationi, without relying on current configuration...
That could be a tetex-bin issue or a xmltetex one.
For sure I see jadetex check one of them, and maybe it has sense.

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

Revision history for this message
In , Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote :

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
> xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:
>
> cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
> xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
> pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
>
> cat /usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex/templates/40xmltex.cnf
> xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
> pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini
>
> Apparently last update did not fix for some reason (dunno why, surely I
> did not altered those files, so update simply fails to do it itself)
>
> So, postinst wrongly suppose that fmtutil --all will create a .efmt file.
> A decent hack should check for .fmt or .efmt presence or force both
> formats creationi, without relying on current configuration...
> That could be a tetex-bin issue or a xmltetex one.
> For sure I see jadetex check one of them, and maybe it has sense.
>

Uhm just an hint, maybe installconf should be used a bit more in
the postinst file :) ?

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

Revision history for this message
In , Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : [frankie@debian.org: ah, nice problem...]

----- Forwarded message from Francesco Paolo Lovergine <email address hidden> -----

From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: ah, nice problem...

I found the same problem on my desktop at work and my laptop.
xmltex wrongly suppose the efmt is available:

cat /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40xmltex.cnf
xmltex tex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdftex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini

cat /usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex/templates/40xmltex.cnf
xmltex etex language.dat &latex xmltex.ini
pdfxmltex pdfetex language.dat &pdflatex pdfxmltex.ini

Apparently last update did not fix for some reason (dunno why, surely I
did not altered those files, so update simply fails to do it itself)

So, postinst wrongly suppose that fmtutil --all will create a .efmt file.
A decent hack should check for .fmt or .efmt presence or force both
formats creationi, without relying on current configuration...
That could be a tetex-bin issue or a xmltetex one.
For sure I see jadetex check one of them, and maybe it has sense.

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

----- End forwarded message -----

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

Revision history for this message
In , Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie) wrote : can be reproduced

tags 262395 - unreproducible
thanks

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Merge postinst failure

merge 306595 311557
severity 306595 grave
thanks

--
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Merge related

merge 306595 311557
thanks

--
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Revision history for this message
In , Don Armstrong (don-debian) wrote : patch to fix this by checking to see whether efmt or fmt is supposed to be made

The following rather trivial patch seems to clear up this issue here.
[Someone better at shell could probably make it slightly cleaner...
just thank $DEITY that I didn't decide to write it in perl. ;-)]

The basic idea is just to see if fmtutil is going to make an efmt or
fmt, and then check for the existence of the appropriate file.

Don Armstrong

--
Of course, there are ceases where only a rare individual will have the
vision to perceive a system which governs many people's lives; a
system which had never before even been recognized as a system; then
such people often devote their lives to convincing other people that
the system really is there and that it aught to be exited from.
 -- Douglas R. Hofstadter _G� Escher Bach. Eternal Golden Braid_

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Revision history for this message
In , Don Armstrong (don-debian) wrote :

Eugene Konev reminded me (in #debian-bugs) that a fix is needed to the
postrm as well. Since kpsewhich can return both fmt and efmt, the
trivial thing is to look for both:

 # remove fmt and efmt files
 XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
 PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
 rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT

The more complete attached patch does that.

Don Armstrong

--
America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The
world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar
stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of
socially responsible centurions.
 -- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Revision history for this message
In , Don Armstrong (don-debian) wrote : and yet another minor issue

Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft
and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to
fix):

 XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
 PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
 LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true
 rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT

 # remove fmt file logs
 rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/pdfxmltex.log

Don Armstrong

--
America was far better suited to be the World's Movie Star. The
world's tequila-addled pro-league bowler. The world's acerbic bi-polar
stand-up comedian. Anything but a somber and tedious nation of
socially responsible centurions.
 -- Bruce Sterling, _Distraction_ p122

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Don,

I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of
perfection, but the patch looks clean and I couldn't see any obvious
errors.

Regards,
Roger

- --
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFCntK+VcFcaSW/uEgRAlL1AJ9M6O0lPlSPOcgRT1xLJywLfOnCVACg9LFS
L/TVzS0KLEpkx80BZQlM4hI=
=LdSX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Re: Bug#262395: and yet another minor issue

Don Armstrong (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft
> and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to
> fix):
>
>
> XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true
> PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true
> LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true
> rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT
>
> # remove fmt file logs
> rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/pdfxmltex.log
>
>
> Don Armstrong

Don,

Many thanks for the patches. I'm building a new package as we speak.

Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Re: Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Don,
>
> I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it
> worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch
> with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of
> perfection, but the patch looks clean and I couldn't see any obvious
> errors.
>
>
> Regards,
> Roger

Hi,

I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.

Don, thanks again for the patches.
Roger, thanks for testing them.

Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:

> I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.

Does the woody upgrade need testing?

- --
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFCn2W/VcFcaSW/uEgRAknMAKDmJ9rha0eTt3WtgrzXGoZJ6ksVbgCgsfBP
KWo86/VIeaFXx2pIRf7wbJk=
=1zP+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote :

Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
>
> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
>
> Does the woody upgrade need testing?

That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means.

Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:

> Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
>>
>> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
>> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
>>
>> Does the woody upgrade need testing?
>
> That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means.

Done with no problems to report.

I did a base woody install, installed tetex+xmltex and dist-upgraded
to sarge. No errors on upgrade.

Regards,
Roger

- --
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFCn4dcVcFcaSW/uEgRAnPGAJwPn2KpTrWC/dDTbUqkuLLbv0I67QCgvLvI
sRmHkS6Df47FapL/ygNj384=
=sQX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Don Armstrong (dondelelcaro) wrote :

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
> > Roger Leigh (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as
> >> > a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these.
> >>
> >> Does the woody upgrade need testing?
> >
> > That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means.
>
> Done with no problems to report.
>
> I did a base woody install, installed tetex+xmltex and dist-upgraded
> to sarge. No errors on upgrade.

Nice. Thanks, Roger, for testing that out.

Thanks, Ardo, for taking the time to vett the patches and make the upload.

Don Armstrong

--
She was alot like starbucks.
IE, generic and expensive.
 -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch3.htm

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Bug#262395: fixed in xmltex 1.9-10

Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmltex_1.9-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-10.diff.gz
xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
xmltex_1.9-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-10_all.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> (supplier of updated xmltex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:52:41 -0500
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden>
Description:
 xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 262395 306595 311405 311415 311557
Changes:
 xmltex (1.9-10) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * debian/postinst,debian/postrm: updated to support .fmt as well as .efmt
     (closes: Bug#262395, Bug#306595, Bug#311405, Bug#311415, Bug#311557)
     (patches provided by Don Armstrong <email address hidden>. Thanks!)
Files:
 95328a93a7bbc1b1653dc85fb5ec1ed8 822 tex optional xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
 9d795b6af6363e2e0bcfde8371876ed8 10505 tex optional xmltex_1.9-10.diff.gz
 d8e9136ce82179416676d5dffcc4f46c 196534 tex optional xmltex_1.9-10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQp+MQD6XMRfcxSjpAQLcaQP/SsjiBunSROAV6M8AJt/ef4Ug0BSEnbMZ
nr6oODPVMlWMf7Znt1DQbqdtPlKB/tChG7VDvmwIyD2ekAVhxrdeSe+HROX4ZEhl
3ezi4Z90qQo4YiYuTndRIgrJ+nbOB7c3JM5joI0eIPB9pxlBp/5B6UxvayTG8I6f
LXGEMmqvnLw=
=h0H4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
In , Roger Leigh (rleigh-whinlatter) wrote : Not yet fixed in sarge

tags 311557 - sid
reopen 311557
thanks

--
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Revision history for this message
In , Ardo van Rangelrooij (ardo) wrote : Bug#311557: fixed in xmltex 1.9-10

Source: xmltex
Source-Version: 1.9-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmltex_1.9-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-10.diff.gz
xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
xmltex_1.9-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-10_all.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden> (supplier of updated xmltex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:52:41 -0500
Source: xmltex
Binary: xmltex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Ardo van Rangelrooij <email address hidden>
Description:
 xmltex - TeX package for processing XML files
Closes: 262395 306595 311405 311415 311557
Changes:
 xmltex (1.9-10) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * debian/postinst,debian/postrm: updated to support .fmt as well as .efmt
     (closes: Bug#262395, Bug#306595, Bug#311405, Bug#311415, Bug#311557)
     (patches provided by Don Armstrong <email address hidden>. Thanks!)
Files:
 95328a93a7bbc1b1653dc85fb5ec1ed8 822 tex optional xmltex_1.9-10.dsc
 9d795b6af6363e2e0bcfde8371876ed8 10505 tex optional xmltex_1.9-10.diff.gz
 d8e9136ce82179416676d5dffcc4f46c 196534 tex optional xmltex_1.9-10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQp+MQD6XMRfcxSjpAQLcaQP/SsjiBunSROAV6M8AJt/ef4Ug0BSEnbMZ
nr6oODPVMlWMf7Znt1DQbqdtPlKB/tChG7VDvmwIyD2ekAVhxrdeSe+HROX4ZEhl
3ezi4Z90qQo4YiYuTndRIgrJ+nbOB7c3JM5joI0eIPB9pxlBp/5B6UxvayTG8I6f
LXGEMmqvnLw=
=h0H4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
Daniel Robitaille (robitaille) wrote :

This bug (debian #262395) is fixed in xmltex (1.9-10), available in Breezy.

Changed in xmltex:
status: Unknown → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.