Support deriving a distroseries via the API

Bug #644196 reported by Steve Kowalik
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Fix Released
High
Steve Kowalik

Bug Description

There should be an API call that system integrators can call to derive a distroseries into another, creating it if necessary, and adding a job to populate the new distroseries.

Related branches

Steve Kowalik (stevenk)
Changed in soyuz:
assignee: nobody → Steve Kowalik (stevenk)
milestone: none → 10.10
tags: added: derivation
Changed in soyuz:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → High
milestone: 10.10 → 10.11
Revision history for this message
Launchpad QA Bot (lpqabot) wrote : Bug fixed by a commit
tags: added: qa-needstesting
Changed in soyuz:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Steve Kowalik (stevenk)
tags: added: qa-ok
removed: qa-needstesting
Steve Kowalik (stevenk)
tags: added: qa-needstesting
removed: qa-ok
Changed in soyuz:
status: Fix Committed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Launchpad QA Bot (lpqabot) wrote :
Changed in soyuz:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Steve Kowalik (stevenk)
tags: added: qa-ok
removed: qa-needstesting
Revision history for this message
Launchpad QA Bot (lpqabot) wrote :
tags: added: qa-needstesting
removed: qa-ok
Revision history for this message
Julian Edwards (julian-edwards) wrote :

Steve, is this qa-ok or needstesting as it says? I can't keep up with this damned QA bot!

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

There have been multiple landings for the same bug - its been correctly bounced back to needs testing by the bot.

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

Ok to deploy - other soyuz APIs are working on qastaging, so this doesn't break anything. (It might not work, but thats a different question :))

tags: added: qa-ok
removed: qa-needstesting
Revision history for this message
Julian Edwards (julian-edwards) wrote : Re: [Bug 644196] Re: Support deriving a distroseries via the API

On Tuesday 09 November 2010 19:46:02 Robert Collins wrote:
> There have been multiple landings for the same bug - its been correctly
> bounced back to needs testing by the bot.

Not necessarily. Steve might have marked it qa-ok based on dogfood testing.
Like I've said elsewhere, I've requested a way of marking this to stop the bot
undoing the work.

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

We'll probably need a special tag for that - for the main use case resetting is appropriate.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

I am of the opinion that this is needstesting, but Rob would much prefer to rollout stuff to production which might be broken, but doesn't impact on other stuff. I am at a little bit of loss to QA this on qastaging this week, but I can update dogfood and QA it there. Maybe it will even work.

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Steve Kowalik <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am of the opinion that this is needstesting, but Rob would much prefer
> to rollout stuff to production which might be broken, but doesn't impact
> on other stuff. I am at a little bit of loss to QA this on qastaging
> this week, but I can update dogfood and QA it there. Maybe it will even
> work.

s/broken/not a regression/

-Rob

Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
Changed in soyuz:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Steve Kowalik (stevenk)
Changed in soyuz:
status: Fix Released → Fix Committed
Changed in soyuz:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.