tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Bug #27383 reported by Debian Bug Importer
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
tetex-bin (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
tetex-bin (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #344082 http://bugs.debian.org/344082

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #344082 http://bugs.debian.org/344082

Revision history for this message
In , Frank Küster (frank-debian) wrote : Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,

again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and 343444 be the
same bugs? Emmanuel, which version of bash is installed on your system?

Emmanuel Fuste <email address hidden> wrote:

> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-12) ...
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> /usr/bin/fmtutil: line 344: 16723 Segmentation fault ${1+"$@"}

Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in

###############################################################################
# verbose (cmd)
# execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
###############################################################################
verbose()
{
  $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
}

and again there is a variable that's supposed to contain a command and
is not yet expanded before the shell segfaults.

> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i586)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Regards, Frank

--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:23:48 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, Emmanuel Fuste <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,

again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and 343444 be the
same bugs? Emmanuel, which version of bash is installed on your system?=20

Emmanuel Fuste <email address hidden> wrote:

> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-12) ...
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> /usr/bin/fmtutil: line 344: 16723 Segmentation fault ${1+"$@"}

Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in=20

###########################################################################=
####
# verbose (cmd)
# execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
###########################################################################=
####
verbose()
{
  $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
}

and again there is a variable that's supposed to contain a command and
is not yet expanded before the shell segfaults.

> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i586)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
> Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968)

Regards, Frank

--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
In , emmanuel.fuste (emmanuel-fuste) wrote :

Hi,

I think it is the latest sid one, I'll check this evening.

Regards,

Emmanuel.

> Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
>
> again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and
343444 be the
> same bugs? Emmanuel, which version of bash is installed on
your system?
>
> Emmanuel Fuste <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-bin
> > Version: 3.0-12
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-12) ...
> > Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> > /usr/bin/fmtutil: line 344: 16723 Segmentation fault
${1+"$@"}
>
> Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in
>
>
###############################################################################
> # verbose (cmd)
> # execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
>
###############################################################################
> verbose()
> {
> $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
> }
>
> and again there is a variable that's supposed to contain a
command and
> is not yet expanded before the shell segfaults.
>
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: testing/unstable
> > APT prefers unstable
> > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> > Architecture: i386 (i586)
> > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> > Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
> > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
>
>
> Regards, Frank
>
> --
> Frank Küster
> Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
> Debian Developer
>
>

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
Jusqu'au 25 décembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'Avent et
 gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en jeu !

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <IRSX22$<email address hidden>>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:46:50 +0100
From: "emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden>
To: "frank" <email address hidden>
Cc: "doko" <email address hidden>, "344082" <email address hidden>, "343444" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Hi,

I think it is the latest sid one, I'll check this evening.

Regards,

Emmanuel.

> Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
>
> again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and
343444 be the
> same bugs? Emmanuel, which version of bash is installed on
your system?
>
> Emmanuel Fuste <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-bin
> > Version: 3.0-12
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-12) ...
> > Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> > /usr/bin/fmtutil: line 344: 16723 Segmentation fault
${1+"$@"}
>
> Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in
>
>
#########################################################################=
######
> # verbose (cmd)
> # execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
>
#########################################################################=
######
> verbose()
> {
> $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
> }
>
> and again there is a variable that's supposed to contain a
command and
> is not yet expanded before the shell segfaults.
>
> > -- System Information:
> > Debian Release: testing/unstable
> > APT prefers unstable
> > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> > Architecture: i386 (i586)
> > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> > Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
> > Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968)
>
>
> Regards, Frank
>
> --
> Frank K=FCster
> Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
> Debian Developer
>
> =0A=0AAcc=E9dez au courrier =E9lectronique de La Poste : www.laposte.ne=
t ;=0AJusqu'au 25 d=E9cembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l=
'Avent et=0A=A0gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux e=
n jeu !=0A=0A

Revision history for this message
In , emmanuel.fuste (emmanuel-fuste) wrote :

Hello,

As promised:

ii bash 3.1-1 The GNU Bourne Again SHell

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages bash depends on:
ii base-files 3.1.9 Debian base
system miscellaneous f
ii debianutils 2.15.2 Miscellaneous
utilities specific t
ii libc6 2.3.5-9 GNU C Library:
Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries
for terminal hand

> Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
>
> again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and
343444 be the
> same bugs? Emmanuel, which version of bash is installed on
your system?
>

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
Jusqu'au 25 décembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'Avent et
 gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en jeu !

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <IRTGXL$<email address hidden>>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:56:09 +0100
From: "emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden>
To: "frank" <email address hidden>
Cc: "doko" <email address hidden>, "344082" <email address hidden>, "343444" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Hello,

As promised:

ii bash 3.1-1 The GNU Bourne Again SHell

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages bash depends on:
ii base-files 3.1.9 Debian base
system miscellaneous f
ii debianutils 2.15.2 Miscellaneous
utilities specific t
ii libc6 2.3.5-9 GNU C Library:
Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries
for terminal hand

> Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
>
> again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and
343444 be the
> same bugs? Emmanuel, which version of bash is installed on
your system?
>
=0A=0AAcc=E9dez au courrier =E9lectronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net =
;=0AJusqu'au 25 d=E9cembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'A=
vent et=0A=A0gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en =
jeu !=0A=0A

Revision history for this message
In , Frank Küster (frank-kuesterei) wrote :

Frank Küster <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
>
> again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and 343444 be the
> same bugs?

It turned out that theo other bug, 34344, was a segfault in the program
that was called on the respective line in the script. So I guess we can
assume that in this case it isn't bash, either.

> Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in
>
> ###############################################################################
> # verbose (cmd)
> # execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
> ###############################################################################
> verbose()
> {
> $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
> }

I assume that the problem persists on your system, i.e. if you try to
configure tetex-bin it happens again? If that is true, can you please
try "fmtutil-sys --all" - does this also give the segfault? If that
happens, please run

sh -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys --all 2>&1 | tee fmtutil.debug

and send us the resulting file fmtutil.debug.

Regards, Frank

--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:39:34 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: Emmanuel Fuste <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Frank K=FCster <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
>
> again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and 343444 be the
> same bugs?=20=20

It turned out that theo other bug, 34344, was a segfault in the program
that was called on the respective line in the script. So I guess we can
assume that in this case it isn't bash, either.

> Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in=20
>
> #########################################################################=
######
> # verbose (cmd)
> # execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
> #########################################################################=
######
> verbose()
> {
> $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
> }

I assume that the problem persists on your system, i.e. if you try to
configure tetex-bin it happens again? If that is true, can you please
try "fmtutil-sys --all" - does this also give the segfault? If that
happens, please run

sh -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys --all 2>&1 | tee fmtutil.debug

and send us the resulting file fmtutil.debug.

Regards, Frank

--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
In , Frank Küster (frank-debian) wrote :

severity 344082 important
tags 344082 moreinfo unreproducible
stop

Downgrading this bug since the submitter didn't react for a couple of
days. If he does react and it turns out to be reproducible on his
system, I plan to raise it again; if he doesn't react at all until mid
January (christmas holidays until Jan. 6 +~ one week), I'll ask again
and finally close.

Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:08:24 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Debian Bug Control Server <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

severity 344082 important
tags 344082 moreinfo unreproducible
stop

Downgrading this bug since the submitter didn't react for a couple of
days. If he does react and it turns out to be reproducible on his
system, I plan to raise it again; if he doesn't react at all until mid
January (christmas holidays until Jan. 6 +~ one week), I'll ask again
and finally close.

Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
In , emmanuel.fuste (emmanuel-fuste) wrote :

> Frank Küster <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
> >
> > again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and
343444 be the
> > same bugs?
>
> It turned out that theo other bug, 34344, was a segfault in
the program
> that was called on the respective line in the script. So I
guess we can
> assume that in this case it isn't bash, either.
>
> > Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in
> >
> >
###############################################################################
> > # verbose (cmd)
> > # execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
> >
###############################################################################
> > verbose()
> > {
> > $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
> > }
>
> I assume that the problem persists on your system, i.e. if
you try to
> configure tetex-bin it happens again?

Yes

> If that is true, can you please
> try "fmtutil-sys --all" - does this also give the segfault?
 If that
> happens, please run
>
> sh -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys --all 2>&1 | tee fmtutil.debug
>
> and send us the resulting file fmtutil.debug.
>
Will try this evening.

Regards,
Emmanuel.

> Regards, Frank
>
> --
> Frank Küster
> Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
> Debian Developer
>
>

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
Jusqu'au 25 décembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'Avent et
 gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en jeu !

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <IS99OE$<email address hidden>>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:41:02 +0100
From: "emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden>
To: "frank" <email address hidden>
Cc: "344082" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

> Frank K=FCster <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hi Matthias, hi Emmanuel,
> >
> > again a shell script that segfaults. Could 344082 and
343444 be the
> > same bugs?
>
> It turned out that theo other bug, 34344, was a segfault in
the program
> that was called on the respective line in the script. So I
guess we can
> assume that in this case it isn't bash, either.
>
> > Line 344 is the opening brace `{' in
> >
> >
#########################################################################=
######
> > # verbose (cmd)
> > # execute cmd. Redirect output depending on $mktexfmtMode.
> >
#########################################################################=
######
> > verbose()
> > {
> > $mktexfmtMode && ${1+"$@"} >&2 || ${1+"$@"}
> > }
>
> I assume that the problem persists on your system, i.e. if
you try to
> configure tetex-bin it happens again?

Yes

> If that is true, can you please
> try "fmtutil-sys --all" - does this also give the segfault?
 If that
> happens, please run
>
> sh -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys --all 2>&1 | tee fmtutil.debug
>
> and send us the resulting file fmtutil.debug.
>
Will try this evening.

Regards,
Emmanuel.

> Regards, Frank
>
> --
> Frank K=FCster
> Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
> Debian Developer
>
> =0A=0AAcc=E9dez au courrier =E9lectronique de La Poste : www.laposte.ne=
t ;=0AJusqu'au 25 d=E9cembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l=
'Avent et=0A=A0gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux e=
n jeu !=0A=0A

Revision history for this message
In , emmanuel.fuste (emmanuel-fuste) wrote :

> Frank Küster <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I assume that the problem persists on your system, i.e. if
you try to
> configure tetex-bin it happens again? If that is true, can
you please
> try "fmtutil-sys --all" - does this also give the segfault?
yes :
..
.
This is Aleph, Version 3.141592-1.15-2.1-0.0-rc4 (Web2C 7.5.4)
(INIALEPH)
Copyright (c) 2002--2004 the Aleph task force
entering extended mode
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/config/lambda.ini
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/lambda/base/lambda.tex/usr/bin/fmtutil:
line 344: 7510 Segmentation fault ${1+"$@"}
Error: `aleph -ini -jobname=lamed -progname=lamed
*lambda.ini' failed
..

> If that happens, please run
>
> sh -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys --all 2>&1 | tee fmtutil.debug
>
> and send us the resulting file fmtutil.debug.
Ok, as an attachment.

Under gdb if it could help :

rafale:~# gdb aleph --args aleph -ini -jobname=lamed
-progname=lamed *lambda.ini
GNU gdb 6.3.90_20051119-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty"
for details.
This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...(no debugging
symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".

(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/aleph -ini -jobname=lamed
-progname=lamed \*lambda.ini
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
This is Aleph, Version 3.141592-1.15-2.1-0.0-rc4 (Web2C 7.5.4)
(INIALEPH)
Copyright (c) 2002--2004 the Aleph task force
entering extended mode
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/config/lambda.ini
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/lambda/base/lambda.tex
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x080780ef in scandir ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080780ef in scandir ()
#1 0x080a0062 in scandir ()
#2 0x08050704 in ?? ()
#3 0x00000000 in ?? ()

>
> Regards, Frank
>
> --
> Frank Küster
> Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
> Debian Developer
>
>

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
Jusqu'au 25 décembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'Avent et
 gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en jeu !

Revision history for this message
In , emmanuel.fuste (emmanuel-fuste) wrote :

Hello,

Me again.

I've just upgraded my system with an apt-get update apt-get
upgrade and no more segfault !

Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-13) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... done.

It seems that his bug is solved by tetex-bin_3.0-13 !!

Regards,
Emmanuel.

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
Jusqu'au 25 décembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'Avent et
 gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en jeu !

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <ISA9J1$<email address hidden>>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:35:25 +0100
From: "emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden>
To: "frank" <email address hidden>
Cc: "344082" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

Hello,

Me again.

I've just upgraded my system with an apt-get update apt-get
upgrade and no more segfault !

Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-13) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... done.

It seems that his bug is solved by tetex-bin_3.0-13 !!

Regards,
Emmanuel.
=0A=0AAcc=E9dez au courrier =E9lectronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net =
;=0AJusqu'au 25 d=E9cembre, participez au grand jeu du Calendrier de l'A=
vent et=0A=A0gagnez tous les jours de nombreux lots, + de 300 cadeaux en =
jeu !=0A=0A

Revision history for this message
In , Frank Küster (frank-kuesterei) wrote :

"emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Me again.
>
> I've just upgraded my system with an apt-get update apt-get
> upgrade and no more segfault !
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-13) ...
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... done.
>
> It seems that his bug is solved by tetex-bin_3.0-13 !!

Ah, fine. Then it was probably related to bug #344912, wrongly linked
libraries - or it was in a library that you upgraded at the same time.
I'm closing the bug.

Regards, Frank

--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:09:52 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: "emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden>
Cc: "344082" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

"emmanuel\.fuste" <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Me again.
>
> I've just upgraded my system with an apt-get update apt-get
> upgrade and no more segfault !
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-13) ...
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... done.
>
> It seems that his bug is solved by tetex-bin_3.0-13 !!

Ah, fine. Then it was probably related to bug #344912, wrongly linked
libraries - or it was in a library that you upgraded at the same time.
I'm closing the bug.

Regards, Frank

--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer

Revision history for this message
In , Hilmar Preusse (hille42) wrote :

On 30.12.05 emmanuel.fuste (<email address hidden>) wrote:

Hi,

> I've just upgraded my system with an apt-get update apt-get upgrade
> and no more segfault!
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-13) ...
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... done.
>
> It seems that his bug is solved by tetex-bin_3.0-13!!
>
There were some changes between -12 and -13 to fmtutil, but none
which could avoid a segfault:

  * {texconfig,fmtutil,updmap}-sys: improve handling to avoid spurious
    warnings when fmtutil is called from texconfig-sys (Closes: #343172) [jdg]
  * fmtutil: change $scriptname back to $progname to simplify patch [jdg]
  * fmtutil, updmap: fix mktexfmt handling (now called correctly by root
    and non-root) and error message handling when fmtutil/updmap called by
    root [jdg]

I'd rather suspect problems on your system.
Anyway: as the problem seems to be solved now I'm closing this bug.
Please reopen if you disagree.

Happy new year!

Regards,
  Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <20051230203002.GA2900@preusse>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:30:02 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <email address hidden>
To: "emmanuel.fuste" <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#344082: tetex-bin: fmtutil segfault

On 30.12.05 emmanuel.fuste (<email address hidden>) wrote:

Hi,

> I've just upgraded my system with an apt-get update apt-get upgrade
> and no more segfault!
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-13) ...
> Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ...
> Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... done.
>
> It seems that his bug is solved by tetex-bin_3.0-13!!
>
There were some changes between -12 and -13 to fmtutil, but none
which could avoid a segfault:

  * {texconfig,fmtutil,updmap}-sys: improve handling to avoid spurious
    warnings when fmtutil is called from texconfig-sys (Closes: #343172) [jdg]
  * fmtutil: change $scriptname back to $progname to simplify patch [jdg]
  * fmtutil, updmap: fix mktexfmt handling (now called correctly by root
    and non-root) and error message handling when fmtutil/updmap called by
    root [jdg]

I'd rather suspect problems on your system.
Anyway: as the problem seems to be solved now I'm closing this bug.
Please reopen if you disagree.

Happy new year!

Regards,
  Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Fixed in 3.0-12, a newer version is in Dapper.

Changed in tetex-bin:
status: Unconfirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.