Maximum number functions is hard-coded
Bug #1815735 reported by
Nick Papior
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siesta |
Fix Committed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
"Overflow in registry" will be encountered when having many different species etc.
Currently it is hard-coded to 300 which ideally should be made dynamic.
| description: | updated |
| description: | updated |
Revision history for this message
| Alberto Garcia (albertog) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in siesta: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
To post a comment you must log in.
Indeed. When using many species and/or LDA+U, etc, the pool might overflow.
The fix is relatively straightforward, by using a re-sizable allocatable array.
We could write an ad-hoc piece of code, or take the opportunity to write a 'bud' container
for re-sizable arrays.