missing sums for VHD images

Bug #1686750 reported by Michał Sawicz
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
cloud-images
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

There are VHD images published in:

http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/release-20160420.3/

http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/yakkety/
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/zesty/
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/artful/

But there're no sums for them in any of md5, sha1, sha256 files.

The difference between xenial and the rest, at least, seems to be -disk1.vhd.zip vs. .vhd.zip suffix.

Michał Sawicz (saviq)
summary: - missing sums for xenial 20160420.3 VHD images
+ missing sums for VHD images
description: updated
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Dan Watkins (oddbloke) wrote :

The latest releases have these, so I'm marking this as Fix Released.

Changed in cloud-images:
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Adrian R. (adi.g2) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Adrian R. (adi.g2) wrote :

Btw, for me the ZIP file looks newer than the checksum files...

currently the checksums have timestamps of:
[ ] SHA256SUMS.gpg 22-Mar-2019 01:55 836
[ ] SHA256SUMS 22-Mar-2019 01:55 3.3K
[ ] SHA1SUMS.gpg 22-Mar-2019 01:53 836
[ ] SHA1SUMS 22-Mar-2019 01:53 2.6K
[ ] MD5SUMS.gpg 22-Mar-2019 01:50 836
[ ] MD5SUMS 22-Mar-2019 01:50 2.3K

but the vhd.zip file has a timestamp of:
[ ] cosmic-server-cloudimg-amd64.vhd.zip 22-Mar-2019 02:32 514M

why is the VHD file newer than the checksums? why was it modified after the checksums were signed?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.