[needs-packaging] 1.22.6 is not packaged in trusty
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
juju-core (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Trusty |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
We're now in a position to have 1.22.6 enter trusty-proposed.
[SRU Information]
juju-core has a stable release exception in https:/
[Devel Fix]
[sinzui] Prepare source package, and diffs: DONE
[rbasak] Review package and upload of new upstream release with packaging review. The long-term plan for wily is to put 1.24.x in the release pocket because it supported systemd.
[Stable Fix]
[sinzui] Prepare source package, and diffs: DONE
[rbasak] Review package and upload of new upstream release with packaging review. Will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid.
[Pre-QA tasks]
[rbasak] Upload to the development release (wily-proposed): DONE
[rbasak] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): DONE
[QA Status]
Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately.
[sinzui] Upstream QA test against Wily: DONE
[sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: DONE
[sinzui] Upstream release process complete: DONE
Manual tests required:
[sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against wily-proposed: DONE
[sinzui] Test juju-deployer against wily-proposed: DONE
[sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: DONE
[sinzui] Test juju-deployer against trusty-proposed: DONE
The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug.
[Beret] Landscape team QA: not-needed
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
tags: | removed: block-proposed |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
tags: |
added: verification-done removed: verification-needed |
description: | updated |
Hi Robie.
I opened a new bug to track the specific request of placing 1.22.6 into trusty. I have prepared a new source package branch using the trusty 1.22.5 branch I proposed for bug 1462001.
We can see src/github. com/juju/ txn changed; review the change for copyright issues. The only change is two files were updated to LGPL to match the txn project's licence. This change is in response to our audit for 1.22.5.