New upstream microreleases 9.1.18, 9.3.9, 9.4.4

9.4.4-1 is in Debian unstable now and will be autosynced soon.

Updates for all releases prepared, tested (upstream and autopkgtest), and uploaded.

landed in wily: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-9.4/9.4.4-1

Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted postgresql-9.1 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-9.1/9.1.18-0ubuntu0.14.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted postgresql-9.1 into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-9.1/9.1.18-0ubuntu0.12.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted postgresql-9.3 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-9.3/9.3.9-0ubuntu0.14.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted postgresql-9.4 into utopic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-9.4/9.4.4-0ubuntu0.14.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted postgresql-9.4 into vivid-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-9.4/9.4.4-0ubuntu0.15.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

autopkgtests succeeded, and the failing reverse dependencies (asn1oid, orafce) are known bugs in the older tests suites.

This bug was fixed in the package postgresql-9.1 - 9.1.18-0ubuntu0.12.04

---------------
postgresql-9.1 (9.1.18-0ubuntu0.12.04) precise-proposed; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bug fix release (LP: #1464669)
    - Fix possible failure to recover from an inconsistent database state
    - Fix rare failure to invalidate relation cache init file
    - See http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1592/ for details.

 -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:15:01 +0200

The verification of the Stable Release Update for postgresql-9.1 has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

This bug was fixed in the package postgresql-9.1 - 9.1.18-0ubuntu0.14.04

---------------
postgresql-9.1 (9.1.18-0ubuntu0.14.04) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bug fix release (LP: #1464669). No effective changes for
    PL/Perl, the version must just be higher than the one in precise, to not
    break upgrades.

 -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:11:09 +0200

This bug was fixed in the package postgresql-9.3 - 9.3.9-0ubuntu0.14.04

---------------
postgresql-9.3 (9.3.9-0ubuntu0.14.04) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bug fix release (LP: #1464669)
    - Fix possible failure to recover from an inconsistent database state
    - Fix rare failure to invalidate relation cache init file
    - See http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1592/ for details.

 -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:59:10 +0200

This bug was fixed in the package postgresql-9.4 - 9.4.4-0ubuntu0.14.10

---------------
postgresql-9.4 (9.4.4-0ubuntu0.14.10) utopic-proposed; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bug fix release (LP: #1464669)
    - Fix possible failure to recover from an inconsistent database state
    - Fix rare failure to invalidate relation cache init file
    - See http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1592/ for details.

 -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:47:35 +0200

This bug was fixed in the package postgresql-9.4 - 9.4.4-0ubuntu0.15.04

---------------
postgresql-9.4 (9.4.4-0ubuntu0.15.04) vivid-proposed; urgency=medium

  * New upstream bug fix release (LP: #1464669)
    - Fix possible failure to recover from an inconsistent database state
    - Fix rare failure to invalidate relation cache init file
    - See http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1592/ for details.

 -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden> Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:42:04 +0200