Ubuntu
gnome-do package

gnome-do: FTBFS: ./src/ClassicTheme.cs(25,39): error CS0012: The type `Do.Platform.Linux.IConfigurable' is defined in an assembly that is not referenced. Consider adding a reference to assembly `Do.Platform.Linux, Version=0.11.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'

Bug #1277891 reported by Andreas Moog
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-do (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
gnome-do (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Unassigned
Trusty
Fix Released
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Impact]
gnome-do 0.9 FTBFS in Trusty

[Test Case]
Builds on Launchpad.

[Regression potential]
The fix moves some code from Do.Interface.Linux to Do.Platform.Linux to avoid a circular dependency. This should not present any more regression potential than a simple rebuild.

Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/713094:

Source: gnome-do
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: <email address hidden>
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/Do.Interface.Linux.Classic'
> Compiling Do.Interface.Linux.Classic.dll...
> ./src/ClassicTheme.cs(25,39): error CS0012: The type `Do.Platform.Linux.IConfigurable' is defined in an assembly that is not referenced. Consider adding a reference to assembly `Do.Platform.Linux, Version=0.11.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'
> Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings
> make[2]: *** [../build/Do.Interface.Linux.Classic.dll] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/06/20/gnome-do_0.9-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

See original description
Andreas Moog (ampelbein)
Changed in gnome-do (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → High
Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater)
Changed in gnome-do (Debian):
importance: Undecided → Unknown
Andreas Moog (ampelbein)
tags: added: ftbfs trusty
Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater)
Changed in gnome-do (Debian):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote :

please fix the header to match SRU rules

Changed in gnome-do (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Andreas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gnome-do into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-do/0.9-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in gnome-do (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Chris Halse Rogers (raof)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton) wrote : [gnome-do/trusty] verification still needed

The fix for this bug has been awaiting testing feedback in the -proposed repository for trusty for more than 90 days. Please test this fix and update the bug appropriately with the results. In the event that the fix for this bug is still not verified 15 days from now, the package will be removed from the -proposed repository.

tags: added: removal-candidate
Revision history for this message
Mathew Hodson (mhodson) wrote :

This successfully built on amd64 as can be seen here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-do/0.9-1ubuntu0.1/+build/7336938

I was also able to download and run gnome-do 0.9-1ubuntu0.1 on my amd64 machine.

tags: added: verification-done
removed: removal-candidate verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package gnome-do - 0.9-1ubuntu0.1

---------------
gnome-do (0.9-1ubuntu0.1) trusty-proposed; urgency=low

  * debian/control: Update Homepage: to not point at spam URL. (LP: #1442873)
  * debian/patches/03_fix_website_address.patch:
    - Update help links to not point at spam URL. (LP: #1363589)
  * debian/patches/04_fix_mono_3.0_build.patch
    - Fix the build with mono 3.0 (LP: #1277891)
 -- Christopher James Halse Rogers <email address hidden> Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:16:10 +1000

Changed in gnome-do (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-do has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
Changed in gnome-do (Ubuntu Trusty):
importance: Undecided → High
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.