[SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 0.72.1-3

---------------
ceph (0.72.1-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * d/rules,ceph.install: Correct install paths for ceph-* helpers.
  * d/p/modules: Mark libcls_kvs.so as module.
  * d/rules: Rename radosgw upstart configuration to radosgw-instance to
    avoid namespace conflict with init script which breaks backwards
    compatibility (LP: #1255464).

 -- James Page <email address hidden> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:52:48 +0000

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Verification failed; the upgrade does not remove the radosgw.conf configuration so service still tries to use the obsolete upstart configuration.

I've uploaded an additional fix for this package to -proposed to rename the upstart configuration correctly.

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Upgraded a base saucy radosgw; init script was left intact and the radosgw upstart config was renamed correctly.

The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.

This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2

---------------
ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2) saucy-proposed; urgency=medium

  * d/radosgw.postinst,postrm,preinst: Handle renaming of radosgw upstart
    configuration@0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1.

ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1) saucy-proposed; urgency=low

  * Fix namespace conflict between init script and upstart configurations
    which breaks backwards compatibility of radosgw startup (LP: #1255464):
    - d/rules: Rename radosgw upstart configuration to radosgw-instance to
      avoid conflict with radosgw init script.
 -- James Page <email address hidden> Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:58:04 +0000