Pitti gets no lovemail from bug 311

And he has a preferred email!

Strange. pitti, did you get this bugmail? Are you getting other bugmail? Are there any other bugs on which you're Cc'd but not getting the bugmail?

I did get this email, it was just classified as spam, so I didn't read it for a while. Sorry...

Interesting. Why was it classified as spam?

Whoops, the "Why was it classified as spam?" was classified as spam, too:

 pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
                            [score: 0.8193]
 3.0 FROM_ALL_NUMS From an address that is all numbers (non-phone)

sorry, this is obviously a problem on my end. Unless anybody else has still problems, I suggest to just close it. I'm 100% sure that I didn't get some mail from #311, but since the merge of my user accounts this seems to have resolved.

I'll train my spam filter to treat this better, sorry.

I'm worried that others will have the same sort of problem with Malone
when using Spamassasin, however.

Would changing <email address hidden> to <email address hidden> help?

Well, <email address hidden> would be sweet, wouldn't it?

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125

> Would changing <email address hidden> to <email address hidden> help?

Not really, the last three mails all had scores between 3.4 and 3.6. But at least I get them now (my limit is 4.0, which usually yields only very few false positives. I fed them to the ham learner, and it got better now.

Damn spam...

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:57:47AM -0000, Martin Pitt via Malone wrote:
> > Would changing <email address hidden> to <email address hidden> help?
>
> Not really, the last three mails all had scores between 3.4 and 3.6.

I don't understand what you mean. AIUI the rule SA was matching on was
an email whose name part consisted of all numbers (at least the rule
name suggested that). Changing the email address to contain the term
"bug" would avoid that, right?

What do the scores of the last 3 emails have to do with that? :-)