Person application pages shouldn't be indexed if person hasn't used that app

Bug #103116 reported by Matthew Paul Thomas
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Triaged
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

1. Go to <http://www.google.com/search?q=M%C4%81ris%20Fogels>

What you see: something like
* #1 is Māris's Bugs page
* #2 is his Blueprints page
* #3 is his profile page
* #4 is his assigned bugs page
* #6 is his Bazaar branches page
* #7 is his Questions page, which doesn't list any questions
* #9 is his Translations page, which doesn't list any translations.

What you should see:
* #1 should be his profile page.
* His Questions and Translations pages shouldn't appear at all, since they don't contain anything relevant.
* Possibly the other application pages should be downplayed somehow, so that people don't start loathing Launchpad results in Web searches generally.

Bug 157280 is the equivalent for projects, and bug 283830 for deactivated people.

Changed in launchpad:
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Stuart Bishop (stub) wrote : Re: [Bug 103116] Person application pages shouldn't be indexed if person hasn't used that app

Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> <http://www.google.com/search?q=brad%20bollenbach>
>
> At the time of writing, in these results:
> * #1 is Brad's Launchpad page, which is fine
> * #2 is his Blueprints page, also fine
> * #3 and #4 are his Answers pages, but he's never used Answers
> * #5 is his Bugs page, which is fine
> * #8 is his Translations page, but he's never done any Translations
> * #9 is his Code page, but he's never registered any branches.
>
> So that people don't start loathing Launchpad results in search engines,
> a person's pages for each application should be set to not be indexed by
> search engines if that person has not actively used that application.

Also person application pages of invalid users should not be indexed
(eg. https://launchpad.net/~freak)

--
Stuart Bishop <email address hidden> http://www.canonical.com/
Canonical Ltd. http://www.ubuntu.com/

Revision history for this message
Guilherme Salgado (salgado) wrote :

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:44:47AM -0000, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> Also person application pages of invalid users should not be indexed
> (eg. https://launchpad.net/~freak)

We're already telling search engines not to index the overview page of
these placeholder profiles, and since this should be the only place with
links to their application pages, it seems to be enough (only for
placeholder profiles, though).

For instance, a search for

    Ben Guitreau site:launchpad.net

on google doesn't give any results.

In order to actually fix this bug, though, we need a higher level API which
tells, for which Launchpad application, whether or not the user has done any
work in it.

Revision history for this message
Guilherme Salgado (salgado) wrote :

Actually, why do we want to allow search engines to index the application pages for a given person? They're only aggregators of things (related to that person) which are also visible in other pages (and thus indexed from there).

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

That may be appropriate for external search engines. For Launchpad's own site search, it would be less appropriate. I want to be able to search Launchpad for "salgado's bugs" and have the appropriate page directly in the search results (in Google right now, it's result #2 for that search string). So, this could be a problem if we use an external search engine to power Launchpad's site search.

description: updated
description: updated
description: updated
Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
affects: launchpad-foundations → launchpad-registry
Changed in launchpad-registry:
importance: Medium → Low
Revision history for this message
Martin Pool (mbp) wrote :

I don't really believe in this bug. Working out which pages about Maris are the most important is google's job, not ours.

Revision history for this message
Curtis Hovey (sinzui) wrote :

I agree this is not a bug, but if someone submitted a patch that provided <meta> tags that made the useless pages disappear from the results I would land it.

Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
tags: added: users
Huw Wilkins (huwshimi)
tags: added: profile
tags: removed: profile
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.