Comment 4 for bug 687683

hey, Mark. honestly I'd probably have to run it by RH legal to be sure before signing the agreement (you know what lawyers are like) and I was hoping to avoid the complication; would it work for me to assign the copyright for this patch specifically to someone @canonical, or just declare it public domain (I believe I can do that, as a Canadian)? that'd probably keep things simpler. As I'm not a coder I'm not likely to come up with any complex patches anyway; small fixes derived by logic and/or trial and error and/or Google are about all I'm good for. =)