lp:~jeff-licquia/bzr-bisect/yesno

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Ready for review for merging into lp:bzr-bisect

Bazaar Developers: Pending requested 2012-09-16

Diff: 69 lines (+37/-2)

2 files modified

cmds.py (+5/-2)
tests.py (+32/-0)

api

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Bug #1051395: meaning/usage of "yes" and "no" are unclear

Undecided

Confirmed

Link a bug report

Related blueprints

85. By Jeff Licquia on 2012-09-16

Don't hardcode the association between "yes" and "high revision".

Originally, the intent was for "yes" and "no" to mean whatever the user
wanted it to mean, and figure out at runtime whether that made "yes" or
"no" the high rev. This feature was lost at some point (if it ever
existed) and "yes" was assumed to mean "high rev". This was confusing,
because the docs implied you could make "yes" or "no" mean whatever you
wanted.

Now, we figure out from the bisect log which identifier is high, and
stick with that moving forward. Also, there's now a test testing the
"no is high" case.

84. By Jelmer Vernooij on 2012-08-03

Merge fix for compatibility with newer versions of bzr from Thomi.

83. By Jelmer Vernooij on 2011-11-25

Merge support for lazy loading.

82. By Jelmer Vernooij on 2011-08-14

Add basic installation instructions.

81. By Jelmer Vernooij on 2011-08-14

make setup.py executable.

80. By Max Bowsher on 2011-02-10

Fix invalid version info.

79. By Jelmer Vernooij on 2010-11-05

Merge documentation of script exit codes.

78. By Jelmer Vernooij on 2010-11-05

Merge several improvements from Gustaf:

* Several testcases for running a test script.
* Fix up doc string format to be the same as other bzr plugins and core.
* Avoid deprecated bzrlib.trace.info.

77. By Vincent Ladeuil on 2010-10-16

Update the test loading.

76. By Vincent Ladeuil on 2010-10-16

Fix the broken test.