Merge lp:~dave-cheney/pyjuju/go-command-jujut into lp:pyjuju/go
Proposed by
Dave Cheney
Status: | Rejected |
---|---|
Rejected by: | Gustavo Niemeyer |
Proposed branch: | lp:~dave-cheney/pyjuju/go-command-jujut |
Merge into: | lp:pyjuju/go |
Diff against target: |
259 lines (+223/-0) 6 files modified
cmd/jujut/add_machine.go (+41/-0) cmd/jujut/agent.go (+70/-0) cmd/jujut/main.go (+16/-0) cmd/jujut/remove_machine.go (+45/-0) cmd/jujut/setup_dummy.go (+46/-0) state/state.go (+5/-0) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp:~dave-cheney/pyjuju/go-command-jujut |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Juju Engineering | Pending | ||
Review via email: mp+107902@code.launchpad.net |
Description of the change
cmd: add jujut (juju testing)
jujut is a small tool I wrote to push values into the state
to test the provisioning agent. It doesn't replace unit tests
and is not intended to be shipped to customers.
It has value for me, and if accepted, I expect to be replaced at
some point when we have jujuc working.
To post a comment you must log in.
Unmerged revisions
- 191. By Dave Cheney
-
merge from tip and fix
- 190. By Dave Cheney
-
cmd: add jujut (juju testing)
I'm -1 on this at the moment... it seems to have a fair amount of code
duplicated from elsewhere, and I really don't see what it gives us (that
couldn't/shouldn't be exercised by actual unit tests). A bit more
context might help me see the point...
http:// codereview. appspot. com/6243070/